McChriston v. Diversified Consultants

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District McChriston v. Diversified Consultants

McChriston v. Diversified Consultants

Plaintiff:	Jonathan McChriston
Defendant:	Diversified Consultants
Case Number:	1:2018cv00185
Filed:	January 9, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge:	Valerie E. Caproni
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 8, 2019	Filing 38 ORDER 37 Report and Recommendations,, 27 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Diversified Consultants. Because careful review of the Report reveals no clear error, the Court adopts the Report in full and grants Defendant's motion for s ummary judgment. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in Defendants favor, terminate all open motions, and close this case. The Report and Recommendation having given the parties adequate warning, see Dkt. 37 (R&R) at 12, t he parties' failure to file written objections to the report precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga Cty., 517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 7/8/2019) (rj) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. (Main Document 38 replaced on 7/8/2019) (rj).

Date Filed

Document Text

July 8, 2019

Filing 38 ORDER 37 Report and Recommendations,, 27 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Diversified Consultants. Because careful review of the Report reveals no clear error, the Court adopts the Report in full and grants Defendant's motion for s ummary judgment. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in Defendants favor, terminate all open motions, and close this case. The Report and Recommendation having given the parties adequate warning, see Dkt. 37 (R&R) at 12, t he parties' failure to file written objections to the report precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga Cty., 517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 7/8/2019) (rj) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. (Main Document 38 replaced on 7/8/2019) (rj).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McChriston v. Diversified Consultants
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan McChriston
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Diversified Consultants
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?