Khurana v. Wahed Invest, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Harsh Khurana
Defendant: Wahed Invest, LLC, Wahed Inc. and Junaid Wahedna
Case Number: 1:2018cv00233
Filed: January 11, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Lewis A. Kaplan
Presiding Judge: Barbara C. Moses
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 76 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER terminating 69 Letter Motion for Local Rule 37.2 Conference; granting 75 Letter Motion for Discovery. No conference is required as to either dispute. Consequently, the parties' November 12, 2020 letter-application, w hich the Court construes as a request by plaintiff for an order compelling defendants to conduct plaintiff's deposition remotely within the current deposition schedule, is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Dkt. Nos. 69 and 75. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 11/16/2020) (cf)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER: The parties shall complete the depositions of Harsh Khurana and Junaid Wahedna no later than October 31, 2020. The deadline for completion of all remaining discovery, including depositions, is EXTENDED to December 31, 2020. The settlement c onference currently scheduled for October 13, 2020 at 2:15 p.m.is ADJOURNED to November 11, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. In light of the pandemic,the attendance requirements are modified as follows: All attendees may participate in the settlement conference t elephonically, using the Court's teleconferencing facilities. The parties are directed to call (888) 557-8511 on their scheduled date, a few minutes before their scheduled time, and enter (a)the access code 7746387 and (b) the security code t hat the Court will provide to you, by email, on receipt of all parties' confidential settlement letters. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Deposition due by 12/31/2020., Discovery due by 12/31/2020., Telephone Conference set for 11/11/2020 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 9/24/2020) (cf)
August 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER: Due to a conflict on the Court's calendar, the status conference scheduled for September 14, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. is ADJOURNED to September 24, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. The parties shall submit their joint status letter, pursuant to the Court's March 11 Order (Dkt. No. 61), no later than September 17, 2020. (Status Conference set for 9/24/2020 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 8/25/2020) (cf)
June 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 64 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material... (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 6/15/2020) (cf)
March 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER: The President of the United States has declared a national emergency due to the spread of the COVID-19 virus, and the Centers for Disease Control have noted that the best way to prevent illness is to minimize person-to-person con tact. In order to protect public health while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is hereby ORDERED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(3) and (b)(4), that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means, and may be recorded by any reliable audio or audiovisual means. This Order does not dispense with the requirements set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b) (5), including the requirement that, unless the parties stipulate otherwise, the deposition be "conducted before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28," and that the deponent be placed under oath by that officer. For avoidan ce of doubt, a deposition will be deemed to have been conducted "before" an officer so long as that officer attends the deposition via the same remote means (e.g., telephone conference call or video conference) used to connect all othe r remote participants, and so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. It is further ORDERED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4), that all unexpired deadlines for the completi on of fact depositions, fact discovery, expert depositions, expert discovery, and/or all discovery are hereby EXTENDED for a period of 30 days. Nothing in this Order prevents the parties from seeking to further modify the pretrial schedule in this action in light of the COVID-19 pandemic (or for any other good cause). Prior to seeking such relief, the parties must, as always, meet and confer (via remote means) in a good faith effort to reach agreement on how best to fulfill the goals of Rule 1 while avoiding unnecessary health risks. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 3/17/2020) (mro)
March 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: A settlement conference is scheduled before Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses on October 13, 2020, at 2:15 p.m., in Courtroom 20A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. (As further set forth in this Order.) Neit her the scheduling of a settlement conference nor any adjournment affects the parties' other litigation deadlines or obligations. (Settlement Conference set for 10/13/2020 at 02:15 PM in Courtroom 20A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 3/11/2020) (cf)
January 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER adopting 48 Report and Recommendations, 39 Motion to Dismiss filed by Wahed Inc., Wahed Invest, LLC, Junaid Wahedna. Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses has rendered a well considered report and recommendation in which she recommend s that defendants' motion to dismiss the second amended complaint (Dkt. 39) be granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' objections are little if anything more than repetitions of arguments soundly rejected in the report and re commendation. They are overruled. Accordingly, defendants' motion to dismiss the second amended complaint and for other relief (Dkt 39) is granted to the extent that (a) Count II is dismissed without prejudice to plaintiffs right to request (or defendants' right to oppose) the remedy of specific performance in connection with plaintiff's surviving contract claim, (b) Count III is dismissed with prejudice, and (c) paragraphs 26-28, and paragraph 47 on page 13 of the second amended complaint are stricken. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 1/22/2020) (mro)
March 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER: Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses has rendered a well considered report and recommendation in which she recommends that defendants' motion to dismiss: (1) Counts I-IV should be granted with leave to an1end, (2) Count V should be granted with prejudice, and (3) Count VI should be granted with leave to amend and re-file only after plaintiff has complied with NYLL § 215(2). Plaintiff filed a statement of non-objection to the report and recommendation in which he requests 3 5 days t o amend his pleading. The Court adopts the report and recommendation in full. Plaintiff shall file, if he so chooses, an amended complaint consistent with this order on or before May 6, 2019. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 3/29/2019) (jca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Khurana v. Wahed Invest, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harsh Khurana
Represented By: Seth Alan Rafkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wahed Invest, LLC
Represented By: Joshua Elliot Knapp
Represented By: Gavin J. Rooney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wahed Inc.
Represented By: Joshua Elliot Knapp
Represented By: Gavin J. Rooney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Junaid Wahedna
Represented By: Joshua Elliot Knapp
Represented By: Gavin J. Rooney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?