28th Highline Associates, L.L.C. v. Roache
||28th Highline Associates, L.L.C.
||February 19, 2018
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||Robert W. Sweet
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 23, 2020
ORDER for 86 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation in its entirety, and Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees, (Doc. 65) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded $412,956.50 in attorneys' f ees and $53,625.46 in costs. The Clerk's Office is respectfully directed to terminate any open motions and to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Defendant. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 9/23/2020) (rro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|February 25, 2019
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 21 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by 28th Highline Associates, L.L.C.; 30 CROSS MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Iain Roache. Based on the conclusions set forth above, judgment for Plaintiff on th e pleadings is granted and the Defendant's cross-motion is denied. For the reasons set forth, Defendant's second counterclaim, for declaratory judgment that he is entitled to the return of the Deposit, is dismissed. In view of the Opinion i n this action entered this date, the discovery motions are moot and dismissed. Enter judgment on notice. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 2/22/2019) (ama) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. Modified on 2/25/2019 (ama).
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?