Ostrolenk Faber LLP v. Lagassey
| Ostrolenk Faber LLP |
| Paul J. Lagassey |
| 1:2018cv01533 |
| February 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Ronnie Abrams |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER: On January 2, 2020, the Court construed Defendant's motion as one to compel arbitration and granted that motion. Dkt. 46. Staying the case pending the completion of arbitration, the Court ordered the parties to provide an update on th e status of arbitration on or before April 15, 2020. To date, however, the Court has not received that update. Therefore, no later than May 1, 2020, the parties shall submit a joint letter informing the Court as to the status of arbitration. Plaintiff shall provide a copy of this order to Defendant. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 4/27/2020) (rj)
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 42 MOTION to Dismiss. filed by Paul J. Lagassey.For the foregoing reasons, the Court construes Defendant's motion as one to compel arbitration and grants that motion. The matter is stayed pending the comple tion of arbitration. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at docket entry 42 and to stay the case. The parties are ordered to update the Court on or before April 15, 2020, regarding the status of any arbitration., Case stayed. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 1/2/2020) (rj)
|
|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: re: 20 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant filed by Ostrolenk Faber LLP. For the foregoing reasons, Lagassey' s motion to vacate the Clerk of Court's entry of default is GRANTED and Ostrolenk's mo tion for default judgment is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. 20. No later than July 1, 2019 Lagassey shall file his anticipated motion to dismiss or otherwise respond to the Complaint. If Lagassey wishes to file his response on the Court's Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system, he may submit a motion for permission for electronic case filing, a copy of which is enclosed. Also enclosed is a copy of the Court's Special Rules & Practices in Civ il Pro Se Cases which Lagassey is directed to consult with respect to communications with Chambers and other matters. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Defendant. SO ORDERED., Paul J. Lagassey answer due 7/1/2019.( Motions due by 7/1/2019.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 6/10/2019) (ama) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ostrolenk Faber LLP v. Lagassey | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ostrolenk Faber LLP | |
| Represented By: | Max Moskowitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Paul J. Lagassey | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
