Morales v. City of New York et al
| Ricardo Morales |
| City Of New York, Bill De Blasio and Lisette Camilo |
| 1:2018cv01573 |
| February 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 90 Memorandum & Opinion. in favor of City Of New York, Bill De Blasio, Lisette Camilo against Ricardo Morales. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Op inion and Order dated March 15, 2021, The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, theremaining arguments are either moot or without merit. For the reasons explained above, the defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and the case is dismissed; accordingly, the case is closed (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 3/16/2021) (Attachments: # 1 notice of Right to Appeal) (dt)
|
|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 63 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by City Of New York, Lisette Camilo, Bill De Blasio. The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, the remaining arguments are either moot or without merit. For the reasons explained above, the defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing this case. The Clerk is also directed to close all pending motions 5 and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/15/2021) (ks) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER : Any dispositive motions should be filed by July 3, 2020. Responses are due July 31, 2020. Replies are due August 10, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 6/5/2020) ( Motions due by 7/3/2020., Responses due by 7/31/2020, Replies due by 8/10/2020.) (ks)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion to compel (Dkt. 52) is denied in all respects. This Court concludes that discovery in this action is now closed, and the parties are directed (1) to submit a joint status letter to this Court, no later than May 29, 2020, regarding the potential for settlement of this action, and (2) to consult Judge Koeltls Individual Practices regarding any potential summary judgment motions and trial. So ordered. Denying 52 LETTER MOTION to Compel Cit y of New York to produce witnesses addressed to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman from Robert Kraus dated March 13, 2020. Document filed by Ricardo Morales. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman on 5/20/2020) Copies to: All counsel (via ECF). (rjm)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER re: 41 Order on Motion to Compel. For all of these reasons, Defendants are directed produce to Plaintiff unredacted copies of the documents they have labeled Priv-Redact 0001 and 0002 no later than one week from the date of this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman on 12/12/2019) Copies to All counsel (via ECF). (kv)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 36 Letter Motion to Compel. Plaintiff's motion to compel the depositions of three City officials (Dkt. 36) is granted as to one of the officials, and denied without prejudice as to the other two. The parties� 39; request for an extension of the discovery period (Dkt. 36) is granted. (As further set forth in this Order.) For the reasons stated above, it is hereby ordered as follows: (1) No later than one week from the date of this Order, Defendants shall produce to Plaintiff unredacted copies of the documents they have labeled Priv-Redact 0003, 0006, 0014, 0016, 0017, 0029, 0030, 0031, 0032, 0033, and 0034; (2) No later than one week from the date of this Order, Defendants shall produce to Plaintiff unredacted copies of the documents they have labeled Priv-Redact 0007, 0008, 0022, 0023, 0024, 0025, 0026, 0027, and 0028, except that these documents may be withheld or redacted to the extent that they fall within the scope of the work-product doct rine or the attorney-client privilege; (3) No later than one week from the date of this Order, Defendants shall provide to the Court, for in camera review, unredacted copies of the documents they have labeled Priv-Redact 0001 and 0002; (4) Defendants are directed to produce Lupo for a deposition on a date agreed by counsel and the witness; (5) To the extent Plaintiff has moved to compel the depositions of Shorris and Wolfe, his motion is denied without prejudice to renew; and (6) The deadline fo r the close of fact discovery is hereby extended, nunc pro tunc, from September 30, 2019 to February 7, 2020. In light of this Order, the Clerk of Court is directed to close Dkt. 36 on the Docket of this action. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman on 11/21/2019) (cf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
