Elleby v. Doe(s) et al
| Taye Lamonte Elleby |
| Jane or John Doe(s) #1, Jane and John Doe(s), John Doe #2 and #3 John Doe |
| 1:2018cv01577 |
| February 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Analisa Torres |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER adopting 48 Report and Recommendations. For the reasons stated above, the Court ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety and DISMISSES the complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff pro se and close the case. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 6/25/2019) (mro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER for 48 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the thorough and well-reasoned report and recommendation, dismissing the second amended complaint because all claims asserted therein are barred by the statute of limitations. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff pro se and to close the case. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/21/2019) (cf) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
