Pugh-Ouza v. Springhill Suites et al
| Shanell Pugh-Ouza |
| Springhill Suites, Marriott Hotel Services, Inc., Marriott Worldwide Reservation Services, LLC, Marriott Resorts Hospitality Corporation, Marriott Resorts, Travel Company, Inc., Carrie Carpenter, Gina Ngeau and Aubrey Karacia |
| 1:2018cv01755 |
| February 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Katherine B. Forrest |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
203
ORDER: It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court&# 039;s docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within 30 days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the p arties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and "so ordered" by the Court within the same 30-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 8/1/2022) (kv)
|
|
Filing
177
ORDER: The conference presently scheduled for April 7, 2022 is hereby adjourned to April 12, 2022 at 1:00 p.m., at the parties' request. The parties shall use the following dial-in information to call into the telephonic conference: Call-In Number: (888) 363-4749; Access Code: 1015508. This line is open to the public. SO ORDERED., ( Telephone Conference set for 4/12/2022 at 01:00 PM before Judge Ronnie Abrams.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 3/29/2022) (ama)
|
|
Filing
176
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 148 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 152 Letter Motion for Oral Argument. Pending before the Court is Defendants' motion for summary judgment. For reasons that will be articulated at a confer ence on April 7, 2022 at 2:00 p.m., the motion is granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, the Court grants the motion as to Plaintiff's gender discrimination, associational disability discrimination, and hostile work environment cla ims, but denies the motion as to her pregnancy discrimination and retaliation claims. Defendants' request for oral argument is also denied. The parties shall confer and notify the Court as to whether they prefer to have the conference in pers on or remotely. If the parties are unavailable on April 7, they shall propose alternative dates for the conference. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at Dkt. 148 and Dkt. 152. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 3/28/2022) (mml)
|
|
Filing
160
ORDER: Plaintiff's deadline to oppose Defendants' summary judgment motion is extended to September 24, 2021. Defendants' deadline to reply is extended to November 5, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 9/24/2021, Replies due by 11/5/2021.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 9/15/2021) (jca)
|
|
Filing
159
ORDER: Defendants moved for summary judgment on May 12, 2021. According to the briefing schedule proposed by the parties, Plaintiffs opposition was to be due June 28, 2021. The Court subsequently granted two extensions of that deadline due to a s erious medical issue on the part of Plaintiffs counsel. See Dkts. 154, 158. The most recent deadline for the opposition was one week ago (August 20, 2021), and nothing has been filed. Although the Court expects litigants to meet deadlines and, whe re necessary, to file timely requests for extensions, the Court is sympathetic to Plaintiffs counsels condition. Accordingly, the Court sua sponte extends the deadline for Plaintiff to oppose the summary judgment motion to September 17, 2021. The d eadline for Defendants reply is extended to October 29, 2021. If Plaintiffs counsel is not in a position to meet the deadline, or to represent Plaintiff at this time, she shall notify the Court no later than September 17, 2021. SO ORDERED. ( Responses due by 9/17/2021, Replies due by 10/29/2021.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 8/27/2021) (tg)
|
|
Filing
147
ORDER granting 146 JOINT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Motion for Summary Judgment, Opposition, and Reply. The summary-judgment briefing schedule is modified as proposed by the parties. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman on 4/9/2021) (jca)
|
|
Filing
143
ORDER re: 142 Order on Motion for Discovery, 139 Order on Motion for Conference. Accordingly, discovery is now closed, and the Court adopts the following briefing schedule: Defendants' motion for summary judgment is due March 1, 2021. Plaintiff's opposition is due April 15, 2021. Defendants' reply is due May 6. 2021. SO ORDERED. (Motions due by 3/1/2021., Responses due by 4/15/2021, Replies due by 5/6/2021.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 1/13/2021) (kv)
|
|
Filing
137
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Judge Freeman's Order is affirmed and Plaintiff's objections are overruled. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 11/9/2020) (kv)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 96 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Marriott Resorts Hospitality Corporation, Marriott Hotel Services, Inc., Aubrey Karacia, Carrie Carpenter, Springhill Suites, Gina Ngeau, 103 Report and Re commendations. Accordingly, it is hereby Ordered that: (1) Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Karacica are dismissed without conditions and without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(2), and (2) Defendants' m otion for involuntary dismissal of those claims pursuant to Rule 41 (b) is denied. The choice not to file written objections waives appellate review of this decision. See United States v. James, 712 F.3d 79, 105 (2d Cir. 2013). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. 96. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 8/5/2019) (rj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
