Wang v. New York-New Jersey Section of the Ninety-Nines Inc. et al
| Julie Wang |
| New York-New Jersey Section of the Ninety-Nines Inc. and The Ninety-Nines, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv01780 |
| February 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Lewis A. Kaplan |
| Katharine H. Parker |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
165
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 164 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations, in favor of The Ninety-Nines, Inc. against Julie Wang. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated September 11, 2021, Magistrate Judge Katherine H. Parker has filed a Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") suggesting that the defendant's motion for summary judgment should be granted and that plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgmen t be denied. Dkt. 156. That same document contains her opinion on the motions to strike, no appeal from which has been taken. Plaintiff's objections to the R&R are overruled. The motion of defendant The Ninety-Nines Inc., for summary judgment di smissing the complaint is granted. Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment is denied. Inasmuch as the order determines all remaining claims with respect to all remaining parties, final judgment is entered. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 9/13/2021) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal) (dt)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER: This Court scheduled a status conference in this matter on May 10, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. (ECF No. 132.) In light of counsels representations, the Court will adjourn the May 10, 2021 status conference and will extend the briefing deadlines by 30 days. There will be no further extensions granted in this case. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 5/6/2021) (mro)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER SCHEDULING STATUS CONFERENCE: On March 30, 2021, an Order was granted allowing additional time to file pleadings in this case that were due by April 30, 2021. The Court did not receive any briefings. A telephonic status conference in this matt er is hereby scheduled for May 10, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. Counsel for Plaintiff Julie Wang and for Defendant NinetyNines, Inc. are directed to call Judge Parker's Chambers, together, at the scheduled time. Please use the Court's teleconference line: (866) 4345269, access code: 4858267. SO ORDERED., (Telephone Conference set for 5/10/2021 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 5/3/2021) (nb)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER: NOW, THEREFORE, in order to protect public health, reduce unnecessary travel, and minimize the risk of exposure while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1; It is hereby ORDERED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(3) and (b)(4), that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, video conference, or other remote means, and may be recorded by any reliable audio or audiovisual means. This order does not dispense with the requirements set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(5), including the requirement that ("[u]nless the parties stipulate otherwise") the deposition be "conducted before an officer appointed or designat ed under Rule 28," and that the deponent be placed under oath by that officer. In light of the current pandemic, the court reporter may attend the deposition and administer the oath via the same remote means (e.g., telephone conference call or video conference) used to connect all other remote participants, and so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. It is further ORDERED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4), that all unexpired deadlines for the completion of fact depositions, fact discovery, expert depositions, expert discovery, and/or all discovery are hereby EXTENDED for a period of 60 days, together with all post-discovery deadlines previously set by this Court. Nothing in this Order prevents the parties from seeking to further modify the pretrial schedule in this action in light of the COVID-19 pandemic (or for any other good cause). Prior to seeking such relief, the parties must, as always, meet and confer (via remote means) in a good faith effort to reach agreement on how best to fulfil the goals of Rule 1 while avoiding unnecessary health risks. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 3/16/2020) (ks)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER: On January 29, 2020, the parties appeared telephonically for a case management conference. As discussed on the record, the following order is entered. Discovery. The deadline for discovery is extended to April 3, 2020. No further extension s will be granted. Requests to Admit. Requests to admit shall be served no later than March 6, 2020. Responses are due by no later than April 6, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 1/31/2020) ( Discovery due by 4/3/2020., Responses due by 4/6/2020) (ks)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER re: 10 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Julie Wang, 22 Report and Recommendations. The motion to remand [DI 10] is denied. While I agree with much of the magistrate judge's reasoning and with the result, this order should not be read as adopting each and every part of the rationale set forth in the R&R. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 7/16/2018) (anc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
