Heiloo v. Fruitco Corporation et al
| Josephine Heiloo |
| Fruitco Corporation and John Does 1-10 |
| 1:2018cv01917 |
| March 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| J. Paul Oetken |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER... The Court has reviewed the terms of the proposed settlement and finds that they are fair and reasonable under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199, 203, 206 (2d Cir. 2015). To that end, the proposed settlement at Docket Nu mber 39 is approved, and the case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court shall retain jurisdiction solely to resolve any disputes arising from the settlement agreement and the settlement of this action. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 3/4/20) (yv)
|
|
Filing
38
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 37 JOINT MOTION to Approve Settlement . filed by Josephine Heiloo.Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the joint motion for settlement approval is DENIED. The parties may file a revised agreement consistent with this opinion by November 22, 2019. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 37. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 10/25/2019) (js)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
