Chase Morris v. United States Postal Service
Plaintiff: Cherlene Chase Morris
Defendant: United States Postal Service
Case Number: 1:2018cv01920
Filed: March 2, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Westchester
Presiding Judge: Valerie E. Caproni
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER: The parties have advised the Court that this action has been settled. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the ac tion within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Any pending motions shall be terminated as moot, and all conferences shall be vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 2/9/2021) (nb)
June 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 68 SETTLEMENT REFERRAL ORDER: The parties having requested a reference to a magistrate judge for settlement, the parties are directed to submit a joint letter by email to the chambers of the Honorable Barbara Moses, at Moses_NYSDChambers@nysd.u scourts.gov, offering three mutually available dates for an afternoon settlement conference, beginning at 2 pm Mondays through Thursdays under Judge Moses's supervision. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 6/17/2020) (rro)
May 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 66 OPINION & ORDER re: 64 JOINT MOTION for Settlement Approval filed by United States Postal Service. For the foregoing reasons, the Court approves the parties' proposed settlement agreement (ECF 65-1) as fair and reasonab le. It is HEREBY ORDERED that the action is dismissed with prejudice against USPS and without costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to close ECF 64. SO ORDERED. (United States Postal Service terminated.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 5/4/2020) (rro)
January 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint status report. (ECF 54). The parties' application is GRANTED. Plaintiff and Defendant NALC shall file a joint status letter by January 24, 2020. Because Plaintiff and Defendant USPS hav e advised that they have a reached a settlement in this matter, the parties shall file the proposed settlement and joint memorandum of law, explaining why the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015). The proposed settlement and accompanying memorandum shall be filed by February 10, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 1/13/2020) (rro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chase Morris v. United States Postal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cherlene Chase Morris
Represented By: Andrea Maria Paparella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Postal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?