Stefanovic et al v. Old Heidelberg Corp. et al
| Andjela Stefanovic, Uros Dukic and Bojana Novakovic |
| Old Heidelberg Corp. and Eva Matischak |
| 1:2018cv02093 |
| March 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Kevin Nathaniel Fox |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants Old Heidelberg Corp. d/b/a Heidelberg Restaurant and Eva Matischak, jointly and severally, in the amount of $170,000.00, inclusi ve of attorneys' fees and costs, in full and final resolution of all of Plaintiffs' claims in this action. The Clerk of Court is requested to close this case. SO ORDERED. Eva Matischak and Old Heidelberg Corp. terminated. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 12/8/2022) (vfr)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT: The attorneys for the parties have advised the Court that this action has been or will be settled. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties file the proposed settlement agreement for Court approval of the agre ement as fair and reasonable, insofar as it addresses claims asserted under the Fair Labor Standards Act, by December 5, 2022. The approval request must be supported by a declaration and any other evidence necessary to support the requested determination. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199, 205 (2d Cir. 2015). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/14/2022) (ks)
|
|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 55 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Partial), Cross-Motion, and Opposition. filed by Danijel Mirkov, Bojana Novakovic, Uros Dukic, Andjela Stefanovic, 49 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment < /i>. filed by Eva Matischak, Old Heidelberg Corp.., For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on Counts Five, Seven and Eight against the Restaurant only, and as to the Counterclaim, is granted. Defendants' moti on for summary judgment is granted as to all claims arising under the FLSA prior to March 7, 2015, and is otherwise denied. This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves docket entry nos. 49 and 55. This case remains referred to Magistrate Judge Will is for general pretrial management. The parties must promptly contact Judge Willis' chambers to request a settlement conference and to address what, if any, pretrial matters remain outstanding if settlement of all outstanding issues cannot be achieved. The final pretrial conference is adjourned to December 9, 2022, at 9:30 a.m. The parties shall confer and make submissions in advance of the conference in accordance with the Pretrial Scheduling Order (docket entry no. 43). SO ORDERED. ( Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/9/2022 at 09:30 AM before Judge Laura Taylor Swain.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 8/31/2022) (tg) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER: In light of the pending motion(s), the final pretrial conference scheduled for July 29, 2022, is rescheduled to October 7, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 17C. SO ORDERED. ( Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/7/2022 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 17C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Laura Taylor Swain.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/19/2022) (vfr)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER: In light of the pending motion(s), the final pretrial conference scheduled for April 29, 2022, is rescheduled to July 29, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 17C. SO ORDERED. ( Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/29/2022 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 17C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Laura Taylor Swain.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 4/18/2022) (vfr)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER: In light of the pending motion(s), the final pretrial conference scheduled for January 28, 2022, is rescheduled to April 29, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 17C. ( Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/29/2022 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 17C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Laura Taylor Swain.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 1/18/2022) (ate)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER: In light of the pending motion(s), the final pretrial conference scheduled for October 8, 2021, is rescheduled to January 28, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 17C. SO ORDERED. ( Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/28/2022 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 17C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Laura Taylor Swain.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 9/24/2021) (vfr)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER: In light of the pending motion(s), the final pretrial conference scheduled for April 9, 2021, is rescheduled to July 23, 2021, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 17C., (Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/23/2021 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 17C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Laura Taylor Swain.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 4/6/2021) (nb)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER: A telephonic status conference was held with the parties on June 4, 2020. As a result of the discussion had during the conference, the time for the parties to complete their pretrial discovery activities is enlarged to September 30, 2020. SO ORDERED. ( Discovery due by 9/30/2020.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 6/4/2020) (va)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. all discovery, of whatever nature, be initiated so as to be completed on or before July 3, 2020; 2. a telephonic status conference will be held with the parties on June 4, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. The parties should call (888)557-8511 and, thereafter, enter access code 4862532; and 3. should the parties determine that participating in the court's mediation program or having a settlement conference convened by the Court would be of utility, they must write to the Court so indicating. Should the parties elect to have a settlement conference convened by the Court, they should propose three dates, in their writing, on which all parties are available to participate in the conference. SO ORDERED. ( Discovery due by 7/3/2020., Telephone Conference set for 6/4/2020 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 2/18/2020) (va)
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: 18 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Old Heidelberg Corp.'s counterclaim filed by Danijel Mirkov, Bojana Novakovic, Uros Dukic, Andjela Stefanovic. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss Defendants' counterclaim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted is denied as to Plaintiff Danijel Mirkov, and granted as to Plaintiffs Andjela Stefanovic, Uros Dukic, and Bojana Novakovic. Defendants may move, within 21 d ays of the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, for leave to amend their Counterclaim to allege further facts regarding Plaintiffs Stefanovic, Dukic, and Novakovic. Any such motion must be accompanied by aproposed amended counterclaim, a blackl ine version of that proposed counterclaim identifying the changed language, and a memorandum of law. Failure to make such a timely motion will result in the dismissal of the counterclaim as against those three Plaintiffs with prejudice and without further advance notice. This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves Docket Entry No. 18. The case remains referred to Magistrate Judge Fox for general pretrial management. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 8/08/2019) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
