LSH CO et al v. AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company
| LSH CO, LSH II CO and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association |
| AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company |
| 1:2018cv02111 |
| March 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Jesse M. Furman |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
359
ORDER granting 354 Letter Motion to Seal. Based on a review of a sample of the documents at issue, the Court finds that the proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to further interests that are sufficient to outweigh the presumption in favor of public access. Accordingly, the application is granted, subject to reconsideration in the event that any party or third party files a motion to unseal a particular document or documents. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 354. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/31/2023) (jca)
|
|
Filing
350
ORDER granting 347 Letter Motion to Seal. Application GRANTED. Within one week, the parties shall ensure that Defendant's motion in limine filings not affected by this endorsement are on the public docket -- whether that is by refiling the documents as modified or by filing a letter advising the Court as to any document that can be unsealed (which the Court can then so order). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 347. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/20/23) (yv)
|
|
Filing
241
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: In short, AXA's motion is GRANTED as to Exhibits A, B, and C, but DENIED as to Exhibit D. That leaves only LSH's request for the continued sealing of redactions to the parties' letter motion papers. Substa ntially for the reasons set forth in LSH's letter, that request is GRANTED, but only to the extent set forth in the last paragraph on page two of LSH's letter - namely, as to the contents of Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, and I reflected by the bl ue highlighting in Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, and as to Exhibits F, G, and J in their entirety. No later than August 29, 2019, the parties shall file whatever they need to file, on ECF or with the Sealed Records Department, to comply with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 8/26/2019) (ama) Transmission to Sealed Records Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
204
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on 197 terminating 195 Letter Motion for Local Rule 37.2 Conference. ENDORSEMENT: Substantially for the reasons set forth above, AXA's letter motion is DENIED. AXA is granted a one-week extension of the deadline to respond to the interrogatories at issue. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate 17-CV-4767, Docket No. 265, and 18-CV-2111, Docket No. 195, and to docket this in both cases. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 3/18/2019) (ne)
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 65 MOTION to Dismiss Motion for Partial Dismissal of the Second Amended Complaint. filed by AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company. In light of the foregoing, the Court need not and does not reach AXA' s other arguments. Specifically, the Court declines to revisit its decision to defer judgment on whether the Brach Foundation can pursue a Section 4226 claim with respect to interrogatories it submitted to regulators and whether there is a private right of action under New York State Insurance Department Regulation 74. As the Court previously held, those issues do not "affect the bottom line" because "the Brach Foundation's Section 4226 claim... survive[s]." (Opinion 3). For the foregoing reasons, AXA's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate 16-CV-740, Docket No. 146. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 7/30/2018) (ne)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
