Nakamura v. BRF S.A. et al
| Ryo Nakamura |
| BRF S.A., Pedro De Andrade Faria, Jose Antonio Do Prado Fay, Claudio Galeazzi, Jose Alexandre Carneiro Borges, Augusto Ribeiro Junior, Leopoldo Viriato Saboya and Helio Rubens Mendes Dos Santos Junior |
| 1:2018cv02213 |
| March 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| P. Kevin Castel |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
180
FINAL JUDGMENT: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 1. This Judgment incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation, and all capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation, unles s otherwise set forth herein. 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Litigation and over all parties to the Litigation, including all Members of the Class. 3. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Cou rt hereby affirms its determination in the Notice Order and finally certifies, for purposes of the Settlement only, a Class defined as: all Persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the American Depository Receipts of BRF S.A. between April 4, 2013 and March 5, 2018, inclusive (the "Class Period"), and as further set forth in this judgment. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, the Court hereby approves the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation and finds that: (a) said St ipulation and the Settlement contained therein, are, in all respects, fair, reasonable, and adequate and in the best interest of the Class, and as further set forth in this judgment. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this C ourt hereby retains continuing jurisdiction over: (a) implementation of this Settlement and any award or distribution of the Settlement Fund, including interest earned thereon; (b) disposition of the Settlement Fund; (c) hearing and determining appli cations for attorneys' fees, expenses, and interest in the Litigation; and (d) all parties herein for the purpose of construing, enforcing, and administering the Stipulation. The Court directs immediate entry of this Judgment by the Clerk of the Court. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 10/23/2020) (jwh)
|
|
Filing
176
ORDER: The settlement hearing of October 23, 2020 at 2 p.m. will be held telephonically. The dial-in information is as follows: Dial-in: (888) 363-4749 Access Code: 3667981 Members of the public may access audio of the proceedings, but will not be permitted to speak and must mute their phones when calling in. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 10/20/2020) (jwh)
|
|
Filing
77
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiffs motion for alternate service is GRANTED as to defendants Faria, Rubens Mendes and Diniz. Plaintiff shall serve process upon defendants Faria and Rubens Mendes by sending, via certified mail, a copy of the Summons and Amended Complaint to their respective attorneys of record and their home addresses, as discussed above. The motion is DENIED without prejudice as to defendants Galeazzi, Fay, Saboya, Ribeiro and Borges. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion. (Docket # 61.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 1/18/2019) (ks)
|
|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER re: 23 MOTION to Appoint City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System to serve as lead plaintiff(s) . MOTION to Appoint Counsel . filed by City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System, 20 MOTION to Appoint Counsel Notice of Motion and Motion to Appoint the Soares Group as Lead Plaintiff and Approve Their Selection of Lead Counsel. filed by Soares Group, 17 MOTION to Appoint BPRINT Investments LLC, Julio Almeida, and Ryo Nakam ura to serve as lead plaintiff(s) . MOTION to Approve Counsel . filed by Julio Almeida, BPRINT Investments LLC, Ryo Nakamura, 12 MOTION to Appoint Steven Trabish to serve as lead plaintiff(s) . filed by Steven Trabi sh, 15 MOTION to Appoint Counsel The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.. MOTION to Appoint John Smolen to serve as lead plaintiff(s) . filed by John Smolen. Birmingham's motion for appointment as lead plaintiff is GRANTED and the Soares Group's motion is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motions and the since-withdrawn motions of the other proposed lead plaintiffs. (Docket # 12, 15, 17, 20, 23.) (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 7/2/2018) (kgo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
