Tepi v. The City Bakery, LLC et al
| Hermenejildo Tepi |
| The City Bakery, LLC, The City Bakery, Inc. and Maury Rubin |
| 1:2018cv02233 |
| March 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Kings |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 39 Order on Motion for Judgment. in favor of Hermenejildo Tepi against The City Bakery, Inc., The City Bakery, LLC, and Maury Rubin in the amount of $ 46,050.00. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memo-Endorsed Order dated November 18, 2019, motion granted, no substantive opposition filed; judgment is hereby entered against The City Bakery, LLC, The City Bakery, Inc., and Maury Rubin ("Defendants "), jointly and severally, in the amount of $46,050, which equals unpaid principal, liquidated damages, and attorneys' fees resulting from Defendants' breach of the Agreement. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 11/19/2019) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal)(dt)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting 34 Motion for Judgment. ENDORSEMENT: Motion granted. No substantive opposition filed. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this matter immediately. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 11/18/2019) (cf) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
