Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Jaidan Industries Inc. et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Jaidan Industries Inc. et al

Plaintiff:	Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund, The New York City and Vicinity Carpenters Labor-Management Corporation and The New York City District Council of Carpenters
Defendant:	Jaidan Industries Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Case Number:	1:2018cv02298
Filed:	March 15, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	George B. Daniels
Nature of Suit:	Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 11, 2020	Filing 54 DEFAULT JUDGMENT: ORDERED AND ADJUDICATED that Plaintiffs do recover of JAIDAN, the Defendant, with its principal place of business at 16 Capi Lane, Port Washington, New York 11050, in the amount of $47,271.01, consisting of (1) the balance of t he interest that accrued on the delinquency associated with the project known as Chelsea District Health Center Renovation ("Project") of $4,507.88, (2) liquidated damages on the delinquency associated with the Project of $15,508. 54, (3) attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $27,254.59; (4) post judgment interest at the statutory rate; and (5) such further legal, equitable, or other relief as the court sees just and proper; and, that the plaintiffs have execution therefore. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 5/11/2020) (jwh)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 11, 2020

Filing 54 DEFAULT JUDGMENT: ORDERED AND ADJUDICATED that Plaintiffs do recover of JAIDAN, the Defendant, with its principal place of business at 16 Capi Lane, Port Washington, New York 11050, in the amount of $47,271.01, consisting of (1) the balance of t he interest that accrued on the delinquency associated with the project known as Chelsea District Health Center Renovation ("Project") of $4,507.88, (2) liquidated damages on the delinquency associated with the Project of $15,508. 54, (3) attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $27,254.59; (4) post judgment interest at the statutory rate; and (5) such further legal, equitable, or other relief as the court sees just and proper; and, that the plaintiffs have execution therefore. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 5/11/2020) (jwh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Jaidan Industries Inc. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund
Represented By:	Todd Dickerson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund
Represented By:	Todd Dickerson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: The New York City and Vicinity Carpenters Labor-Management Corporation
Represented By:	Todd Dickerson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: The New York City District Council of Carpenters
Represented By:	Todd Dickerson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Jaidan Industries Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?