The Livery Round Table, Inc. et al v. New York City Taxi And Limousine Commission et al
| The Livery Round Table, Inc., Black Car Assistance Corporation, The New York Black Car Operators Injury Compensation Fund, Limo Association of New York, Inc., Livery Base Owners, Inc., Fast Operating Corp. and Reuven Blecher |
| New York City Taxi And Limousine Commission, Meera Joshi and City of New York |
| 1:2018cv02349 |
| March 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: The foregoing constitutes the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law pursuant to Rules 52(a) and 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To t he extent not specifically addressed above, any remaining arguments are either moot or without merit. For the reasons explained above, the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 4/18/2018) (mml)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER. Therefore, the parties should have the opportunity to present testimony at the scheduled hearing on any disputed issues of fact that have been raised in the motion for a preliminary injunction. Any evidence should be limited to witnesses who have already submitted declarations to the Court in support of or in opposition to the application for a preliminary injunction. It would be unfair for either party to rely on new witnesses whom the other side has not had a n opportunity to rebut in the papers already submitted. Moreover, the plaintiffs first submitted their request for testimony on April 11, 2018, two business days prior to the date for the hearing. That is insufficient notice for the defendants to gather responsive testimony to witness testimony that the plaintiffs have not even detailed at this point. Therefore, either side will have an opportunity to introduce testimony at the hearing scheduled for April 16. However, any witness who will provide testimony at the hearing must be made available for a deposition on April 13, 14, or 15; and as further set forth herein. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 4/12/2018) (anc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
