Now-Casting Economics, LTD. v. Economic Alchemy LLC
| Now-Casting Economics, LTD. |
| Economic Alchemy LLC |
| 1:2018cv02442 |
| March 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of U.S. |
| Richard J. Sullivan |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
227
ORDER denying 216 Motion for Reconsideration re 216 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 212 Memorandum & Opinion,,, . filed by Economic Alchemy LLC. For the above reasons, the Court denies EA's motion for reconsideration. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the motion pending at Docket Number 216. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 5/30/2023) (jca)
|
|
Filing
219
ORDER with respect to 216 Motion for Reconsideration re 216 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 212 Memorandum & Opinion,,, . filed by Economic Alchemy LLC. Plaintiff Now-Casting Economics, Ltd. is directed to submit its response to this motion, if any, by October 21, 2022. Defendant may submit a reply by October 28, 2022 if Plaintiff so responds. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 10/7/2022) (jca)
|
|
Filing
213
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 212 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Now-Casting Economics, LTD. against Economic Alchemy LLC. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated Septemb er 15, 2022, the Court grants Now-Casting's motion for summary judgment as to its own remaining claim and EA's remaining counterclaims, and denies EA's motion for summary judgment as to Now-Castings remaining claim. Now-Casting's and EA's requests for sanctions are both denied.; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 9/15/2022) (Attachments: # 1 Leave to Appeal) (tp)
|
|
Filing
133
ORDER denying without prejudice 132 Letter Motion to Seal. This motion is denied without prejudice. The request does not comply with the Court's individual rules for filing sealed documents. As noted in the Rules, "[t]he subject docume nt, in unredacted form, shall be contemporaneously filed under seal on ECF (with the appropriate level of restriction) and electronically related to the motion." The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the motion pending at Docket Number 132. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 11/11/2021) (kv)
|
|
Filing
125
DISCOVERY ORDER granting 121 Letter Motion to Compel. Plaintiff's Letter-Motion is GRANTED. Professor Stiglitz shall appear for a deposition, which may take place by remote means (i.e., videoconference), by July 30, 2021. Dr. Stiglitz is no t entitled to advance payment of his fee for the deposition. See Ajasin v. Ortiz, No. 19 Civ. 6814 (RA) (JLC), 2021 WL 1437551, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 16, 2021). As to the reasonableness of Dr. Stiglitz's fee, 'it is well-settled that parti es seeking court intervention to determine a reasonable fee for an expert deposition should do so after the deposition, not before it has taken place." Id. at *1. Accordingly, if the parties are unable to reach an agreement on Dr. Stiglitz� 39;s fee, they may seek court intervention after the deposition has taken place. By August 6, 2021, the parties shall file a joint letter certifying the completion of Dr. Stiglitz's deposition and the close of expert discovery. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to closed ECF No. 121. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 7/19/21) (yv)
|
|
Filing
120
DISCOVERY ORDER, Pursuant to the discovery conference held today, June 9, 2021, the Court orders as follows: 1. By June 23, 2021, Defendants Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) witness shall appear for a continued deposition. The continued deposition shall be limited to two hours in length, and questioning shall be limited to subjects pertaining to the documents on which Plaintiff's expert relied in forming his or her opinion; 2. Defendant shall serve any rebuttal expert report by June 25, 2021; 3 . Any deposition of Defendant's rebuttal expert shall occur by July 16, 2021; and 4. By July 23, 2021, the parties shall file a joint letter certifying the close of expert discovery. SO ORDERED. ( Deposition due by 7/16/2021.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 6/9/21) (yv)
|
|
Filing
111
DISCOVERY ORDER, The Court is in receipt of the parties' letters regarding outstanding discovery (ECF No. 109-110) and ORDERS as follows: 1. Document discovery shall close on March 22, 2021. 2. All fact witness depositions shall be completed by May 14, 2021. 3. All expert depositions, if any, shall be completed by May 28, 2021. The parties are directed to meet and confer to revise the current confidentiality order as necessary to allow for designation of documents for Attorney's Eyes Only. The parties may then submit an updated agreement for the Court's review. SO ORDERED. ( Deposition due by 5/28/2021., Discovery due by 3/22/2021.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 3/9/21) (yv)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL granting in part and denying in part 102 Letter Motion to Compel. Now-Casting's Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close ECF No. 102. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 2/8/21) (yv)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER. The case management conference scheduled for February 8, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. is adjourned sine die. Within one week of the resolution of any outstanding discovery issues presently before Judge Cave, the parties shall file a joint status letter updating the Court on the status of this case and whether any party wishes to file a post-discovery motion. SO ORDERED. The following hearing(s) was terminated: Case Management Conference. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 2/3/2021) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER: Pursuant to the discovery conference held today, Wednesday, December 16, 2020, the Court ORDERS as follows: 1. The parties are directed meet and confer in good faith on the outstanding issues regarding the Defendant's responses to Plainti ff's RFAs and interrogatories, the sufficiency of the document production so far, and the format of document production going forward. 2. If any disputes remain, by January 11, 2021, Plaintiff may file a Letter-Motion to Compel (no more than fiv e (5) pages). By January 15, 2021 Defendants may file a response (no more than five (5) pages)., and by January 19, 2021 Plaintiffs may file a reply (no more than three (3) pages). The filings may attach the discovery requests/responses as exhibits not counted toward the page limit. SO ORDERED., ( Motions due by 1/11/2021., Responses due by 1/15/2021, Replies due by 1/19/2021.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 12/16/2020) (ama)
|
|
Filing
92
NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT AND ADJOURNMENT: This case has been reassigned to the undersigned. All counsel must familiarize themselves with the Court's Individual Rules, which are available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-john-p-cronan. Unles s and until the Court orders otherwise, all prior orders, dates, and deadlines shall remain in effect notwithstanding the case's reassignment, except that the hearing to show cause why the Court should not impose sanctions scheduled for Octob er 6, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. is adjourned to October 20, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the Court will conduct this by teleconference. At the scheduled time, counsel for all parties should call (866) 434-5269, access code 9176261. This hearing shall also serve as a status conference about the litigation generally. Absent leave of Court obtained by letter-motion filed before the conference, all pretrial conferences must be attended by the attorney who will serve a s principal trial counsel. Additionally, within one week of the filing of this Order, the parties are hereby ORDERED to file on ECF a joint letter, described below, updating the Court on the status of the case. The joint letter shall not exceed fi ve (5) pages, and shall provide the following information, to the extent it is relevant, in separate paragraphs: and further set forth in this Order. (Telephone Conference set for 10/20/2020 at 02:00 PM before Judge John Peter Cronan.) (Signed by Judge John Peter Cronan on 10/5/2020) (rro)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER APPROVING WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL JOEL G. MACMULL: The motion to withdraw the appearance of Joel G. MacMull as counsel of record for defendant/counterclaim plaintiff, Economic Alchemy, LLC ("Defendant"), pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.4 of the Local Rules of this Court, is hereby GRANTED. Attorney Joel Geoffrey MacMull terminated. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 8/10/2020) (mro)
|
|
Filing
78
OPINION AND ORDER re: 64 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Now-Casting Economics, LTD., 61 LETTER MOTION for Local Rule 37.2 Conference addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Kyle C. Bisceglie dated Novembe r 28, 2018 filed by Now-Casting Economics, LTD., 66 JOINT MOTION to Dismiss filed by Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Federa l Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Federal Reserve Bank of Dalla s, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. In summary, the motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED, and the motion to dismiss the complaint is GRANTED with prejudice. The parties are directed to attend a status conference on October 17, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions. Docs. 61, 64, 66. (Status Conference set for 10/17/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Edgardo Ramos.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/24/2019) (ne)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Now-Casting Economics, LTD. v. Economic Alchemy LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Now-Casting Economics, LTD. | |
| Represented By: | Kyle C. Bisceglie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Economic Alchemy LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
