Sajous v. Decker et al
Augustin Sajous |
Thomas Decker, Kirstjen Nielsen, Jefferson B. Sessions, Thomas Feeley, Jeffrey Searls and James McHenry |
1:2018cv02447 |
March 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Alison J. Nathan |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 OPINION AND ORDER re: 27 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Ordering Defendants-Respondents to Provide Petitioner-Plaintiff a Bond Hearing, filed by Augustin Sajous. The motion for a preliminary injunction is granted. The Respondents shal l take Augustin Sajous before an immigration judge within fourteen days of this order for an individualized bond hearing, or else they must immediately release Sajous. At the bond hearing, the Petitioner must be released on bail unless the Governme nt establishes by clear and convincing evidence that the immigrant poses a risk of flight or a risk of danger to the community. This resolves docket number 27. Within seven days of this Opinion and Order, the parties shall submit a revised schedul e for the briefing of the motion to certify a class and motion for a classwide preliminary injunction so that the parties may incorporate the effect of this decision into their discussion of those motions, and as further set forth herein. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 5/23/2018) (ras) Modified on 5/23/2018 (ras). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.