Astor BK Realty Trust v. Shanda Games Limited et al
Plaintiff: Astor BK Realty Trust
Defendant: Shanda Games Limited, Yingfeng Zhang, Li Yao, Lijun Lin, Heng Wing Chan, Yong Gui, Shaolin Liang and Danian Chen
Case Number: 1:2018cv02463
Filed: March 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Andrew L. Carter
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 111 CLERK'S RULE 54(B) JUDGMENT re: 110 Judgment in favor of Capitalcorp Limited, Capitalhold Limited, Shanda Games Limited, Danian Chen, Heng Wing Chan, Li Yao, Lijun Lin, Shaolin Liang, Yong Gui against Astor BK Realty Trust, David Monk. I t is, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated November 29, 2022, judgment is entered in favor of the Dismissed Claims as to Defendants Shanda, Capitalcorp Limited, Capitalhold Limited, Li Yao, Lij un Lin, Heng Wing Chan, Yong Gui, Shaolin Liang, and Danian Chen. The judgment of the Dismissed Claims against the Dismissed Defendants is final pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), there being no just reason for delay. All substanti ve proceedings in this Action before this Court are hereby stayed until the resolution of any appeal of the final judgments set forth above. Any Party may move the Court to lift this stay if doing so is in the interest of justice. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 12/1/2022) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER FOR STAY AND ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the Dismissed Claims as to Defendants Shanda, Capitalcorp Limited, Capitalhold Limited, Li Yao, Lijun Li n, Heng Wing Chan, Yong Gui, Shaolin Liang, and Danian Chen. 2. The judgment of the Dismissed Claims against the Dismissed Defendants is final pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), there being no just reason for delay; 3. All substant ive proceedings in this Action before this Court are hereby stayed until the resolution of any appeal of the final judgments set forth above. Any Party may move the Court to lift this stay if doing so is in the interest of justice. Yong Gui, Shaolin Liang, Lijun Lin, Li Yao, Heng Wing Chan and Danian Chen terminated. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 11/29/2022) (ate)
March 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 103 OPINION AND ORDER re: 90 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). filed by Shanda Games Limited, 95 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint . filed by Capitalcorp Limited, Capitalhold Limited, Yingfeng Zhang. Defendants' motions to dismiss are hereby denied in part and granted in part. Count I (fraud) is dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to plead loss causation. Acco rdingly, Count IV (fraud) is also dismissed because there is no primary violation to sustain a Section 20(a) claim for control personal liability. Counts II and III (insider trading) are dismissed against Defendants Shanda, Capitalcorp, and Capita lhold. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 90 and 95 and to terminate Defendants Shanda, Capitalhold, and Capitalcorp from the case. Lead Plaintiff and the remaining defendants shall file a joint statu s report within 14 days informing the Court how they would like to proceed with this case. The Clerk of Court is instructed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 90, 95. Shanda Games Limited, Capitalcorp Limited and Capitalhold Limited terminated. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 3/31/2022) (jca)
September 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 70 OPINION AND ORDER re: 68 LETTER MOTION for Conference re: 66 LETTER MOTION for Conference for Leave to File Motion to Amend the Complaint and Add New Plaintiff addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Carol C. Villegas and Michael Grunfeld dated January 2 filed by David Monk, 66 LETTER MOTION for Conference for Leave to File Motion to Amend the Complaint and Add New Plaintiff addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Carol C. Villegas and Michael Gr unfeld dated January 28, 2020. filed by David Monk. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. The Court concludes that the reconsidered arguments lack merit. Consistent with the request from Plaintiff, the Court will issue a scheduling order to consider granting Plaintiff leave to amend. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 66 and 68. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 9/30/2020) (jca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Astor BK Realty Trust v. Shanda Games Limited et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Astor BK Realty Trust
Represented By: Eduard Korsinsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shanda Games Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yingfeng Zhang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Li Yao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lijun Lin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heng Wing Chan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yong Gui
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shaolin Liang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Danian Chen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?