Centurion Companies, Inc. et al v. Cardinal Equity, L.L.C. et al
Plaintiff: Centurion Companies, Inc. and Christopher Poppe
Defendant: Cardinal Equity, L.L.C. and Cesar Valero
Case Number: 1:2018cv02540
Filed: March 22, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Lewis A. Kaplan
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER (Corrected): Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit on March 22, 2018. (DI 1.) The complaint did not adequately allege subject matter jurisdiction. The same day, the court ordered plaintiffs to file an amended complaint con-ecting this defect, or els e the action would be dismissed or remanded. (DI 4.) Plaintiffs did not file an amended complaint. On August 19, 2019, the court granted plaintiffs' motion for a default judgment. (DI 15.) The judgment was entered on the same day. (DI 17.) On October 3, 2019 defendants moved to vacate the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1). (DI 19.) Defendants' motion is granted and the case is dismissed for lack of subject matterjurisdiction. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 11/27/2019) (jca)
November 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting 19 Motion to Set Aside Judgment. Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit on March 22, 2018. (DI 1.) The complaint did not adequately allege subject matter jurisdiction. The same day, the court ordered plaintiffs to file an amended complaint correcting this defect, or else the action would be dismissed or remanded. (DI 4.) Plaintiffs did not file an amended complaint. On August 19, 2019, the court granted plaintiffs' motion for a default judgment. (DI 15.) The judgment was enter ed on the same day. (DI 17.) On October 3, 2019 defendants moved to vacate the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(l). (DI 19.) Defendants' motion is granted and the case is dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 11/26/2019) (jca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Centurion Companies, Inc. et al v. Cardinal Equity, L.L.C. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Centurion Companies, Inc.
Represented By: Marc Jonathan Gross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Poppe
Represented By: Marc Jonathan Gross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cardinal Equity, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cesar Valero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?