Lam v. New York City Department of Education

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Lam v. New York City Department of Education

Lam v. New York City Department of Education

Plaintiff:	Jeannine Renee Lam
Defendant:	New York City Department of Education
Case Number:	1:2018cv02756
Filed:	March 28, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Queens
Presiding Judge:	Katherine B. Forrest
Nature of Suit:	Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 14, 2020	Filing 38 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice butwithout costs; provided, however, that if the settlem ent is not consummated within thirty days of this order, either party may apply by letter within the thirty-day period for restoration of the action to the calendar of the undersigned, in which event the action will be restored. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. Any pending dates and deadlines are adjourned sine die, and any pending motions are moot. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 2/14/2020) (jca)
May 30, 2019	Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, For the reasons stated above, this Court granted in part and denied in part Defendant's motion to dismiss. The parties are directed to appear before the Court for an initial pretrial conference in accordance with Ru le 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on Thursday, June 13, 2019 at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom 705 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York. The parties are further directed to confer prior to the co nference regarding all of the subjects to be considered pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to file a written report outlining their discovery plan pursuant to that Rule. The parties must also submit a joint letter addr essing the following in separate paragraphs: (1) a brief description of the case, including the factual and legal bases for the claim(s) and defense(s); (2) any contemplated motions; and (3) the prospect for settlement. For the Court's convenie nce, the parties must set forth the conference's date and time in the joint letter's opening paragraph. The Court directs the parties to consult its Individual Practices and model Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order, both of which are available on the Court's web site. The written report outlining discovery and the joint letter must be filed at least three days prior to the initial pretrial conference with the Court. The parties shall send courtesy copies of that report and joint letter to the United States Courthouse, Chambers 2204, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York 10007. The Pro Se Office is a valuable resource in assisting litigants who proceed in federal court without the assistance of counsel. The Pro Se Office may be reached at: Pro Se Clerk's Office, Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007, (212) 805-0175 The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this memorandum opinion & order and this Court's March 31, 2019 or der (Dkt. No. 26) to prose Plaintiff Jeannine Renee Lam, 4125 50th Street, Apt SB, Woodside, NY 11377. SO ORDERED. (Initial Conference set for 6/13/2019 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 705, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Paul G. Gardephe.) (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 5/29/2019) (kv) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

Date Filed

Document Text

February 14, 2020

Filing 38 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice butwithout costs; provided, however, that if the settlem ent is not consummated within thirty days of this order, either party may apply by letter within the thirty-day period for restoration of the action to the calendar of the undersigned, in which event the action will be restored. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. Any pending dates and deadlines are adjourned sine die, and any pending motions are moot. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 2/14/2020) (jca)

May 30, 2019

Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, For the reasons stated above, this Court granted in part and denied in part Defendant's motion to dismiss. The parties are directed to appear before the Court for an initial pretrial conference in accordance with Ru le 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on Thursday, June 13, 2019 at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom 705 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York. The parties are further directed to confer prior to the co nference regarding all of the subjects to be considered pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to file a written report outlining their discovery plan pursuant to that Rule. The parties must also submit a joint letter addr essing the following in separate paragraphs: (1) a brief description of the case, including the factual and legal bases for the claim(s) and defense(s); (2) any contemplated motions; and (3) the prospect for settlement. For the Court's convenie nce, the parties must set forth the conference's date and time in the joint letter's opening paragraph. The Court directs the parties to consult its Individual Practices and model Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order, both of which are available on the Court's web site. The written report outlining discovery and the joint letter must be filed at least three days prior to the initial pretrial conference with the Court. The parties shall send courtesy copies of that report and joint letter to the United States Courthouse, Chambers 2204, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York 10007. The Pro Se Office is a valuable resource in assisting litigants who proceed in federal court without the assistance of counsel. The Pro Se Office may be reached at: Pro Se Clerk's Office, Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007, (212) 805-0175 The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this memorandum opinion & order and this Court's March 31, 2019 or der (Dkt. No. 26) to prose Plaintiff Jeannine Renee Lam, 4125 50th Street, Apt SB, Woodside, NY 11377. SO ORDERED. (Initial Conference set for 6/13/2019 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 705, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Paul G. Gardephe.) (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 5/29/2019) (kv) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lam v. New York City Department of Education
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeannine Renee Lam
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Department of Education
Represented By:	Amanda Blair
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?