E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. Novel Brands LLC
Plaintiff: E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Defendant: Novel Brands LLC
Case Number: 1:2018cv02932
Filed: April 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Vernon S. Broderick
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 76 OPINION & ORDER: re: 69 MOTION for New Trial filed by Novel Brands LLC. For the reasons stated above, Defendant's motion for a new trial is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate Document 69. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 8/17/2023) (ama)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 67 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 66 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations, in favor of E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. against Novel Brands LLC in the amount of $ 454,277.32. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 10, 2022, Magistrate Judge Netburn's Report is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff is awarded (1) $387,409.08 in Defendant's profits; (2) $7,672.77 in costs; and (3) &# 036;59,195.47 in attorney's fees, for a total award of $454,277.32. The motion for a Rule 16(a) conference is DENIED as moot; accordingly, this case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 2/11/2022) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal) (dt)
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 66 OPINION AND ORDER for 65 Motion for Conference filed by E. Mishan & Sons, Inc., 60 Report and Recommendations. For the reasons stated above, I hereby ADOPT Magistrate Judge Netburn's Report in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff is awarded (1) $387,409.08 in Defendant's profits; (2) $7,672.77 in costs; and (3) $59,195.47 in attorney's fees, for a total award of $454,277.32. The motion for a Rule 16(a) conference is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Cour t is respectfully directed to (1) terminate any open motions, (2) enter judgment in accordance with this Order, (3) calculate the interest owed consistent with the rate set by 28 U.S.C. § 1961, and (4) close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 2/10/2022) (kv) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing. Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
November 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. Plaintiff shall serve this Order both on Mr. Braca and Defendant and file proof of service no later than December 4, 2018. To the extent possible, Plaintiff shall effect service both via mail and email. 2. Defendant shall file a letter no later than December 10, 2018, explaining why it and Mr. Braca should not be sanctioned for disobeying two orders to enter an appearance in the case (see ECF Nos. 34, 36), two orders to pay $10,000 in fees (see ECF Nos. 27, 34), one order to comply with outstanding discovery demands (see ECF No. 36), and one previous order to show cause (see ECF No. 36). This letter shall also explain whether Mr. Braca has engaged in the unauthorized practice o f law in the Southern District of New York and, if so, why he should not be reported to the disciplinary committee for doing so. The Court further ADJOURNS the deadline for Plaintiff to file or renew its motion for sanctions at this time. 3. Defen dant shall obtain counselwhether or not that counsel is Mr. Bracaand that counsel shall file a formal appearance in this case no later than December 10, 2018. This attorney must affirm under oath that he or she is admitted to the Southern District of New York or, in the alternative, he or she must file a pro hac vice motion. If Defendant does not comply with all of these orders, the Court will find that Defendant has willfully defaulted and will order Plaintiff to file its motion for defaul t judgment no later than January 11, 2019. Regardless of Defendants choice, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff permission to conduct third party discovery if necessary to prove its claims for damages. Such discovery will be completed by January 11, 2019. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 11/30/2018) (jca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. Novel Brands LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Represented By: Brian Joseph Doyle
Represented By: Alan Federbush
Represented By: John Zaccaria
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Novel Brands LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?