Flores-Colin v. La Oaxaquena Restaurant Corp. et al
| Jose Flores-Colin |
| La Oaxaquena Restaurant Corp., Elizabeth Pizarro and Antonio Pizarro |
| 1:2018cv02966 |
| April 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
OPINION & ORDER: Flores-Colin's motion to enforce the settlement agreement is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at ECF No. 41. The case remains closed. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 5/10/2022) (ras)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER: In this Fair Labor Standards Act case, Plaintiff moved to enforce the settlement and enter judgment on September 20, 2021. ECF No. 41. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6.1(b), Defendants' opposition was due no later than October 4, 2021. As of today, Defendants have not filed any opposing memoranda. Defendants shall file their opposition to Plaintiff's motion no later than October 15, 2021. Plaintiff's reply, if any, is due no later than October 22, 2021. If Defendants fail to file their opposition by October 15, 2021, the Court will consider the matter fully briefed and ready for adjudication. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 10/8/2021) (ras)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
