Santi v. Hot In Here, Inc. et al
| Christina Santi |
| Hot In Here, Inc., Vlad Lyubovny and Lataya Edwards |
| 1:2018cv03028 |
| April 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER: In response to the Court's Order, the parties submitted an amended motion and revised settlement agreement. Doc. 71; as further set forth herein. Accordingly, the Court finds that the revised settlement agreement comports w ith Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015) and approves the agreement. The Court hereby dismisses the case with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 71, and to close the case. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 4/16/2020) (mro)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER granting 62 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. The application is granted. The deadline to submit a revised settlement agreement is extended from December 27, 2019 to January 24, 2020. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 12/27/2019) (jca)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting 58 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. The application is granted. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 12/4/2019) (kv)
|
|
Filing
57
OPINION AND ORDER re: 56 JOINT MOTION for Settlement Approval. filed by Christina Santi. The Court will not approve the Agreement as currently written. The parties may proceed in one of the following ways: 1. File a revised settlement agreement on or before December 5, 2019 that explains how the settlement amount was determined, that removes or tailors the release provision and nondisparagement clause as described in this Order, and that does not include a provision forever barrin g Plaintiff from working with or applying for a position with Defendants; or 2. File a joint letter on or before December 5, 2019 that indicates the parties' intention to abandon settlement and continue to trial, at which point the Court will re open the case and set down a date for a pre-trial conference. 3. Stipulate to dismissal of the case without prejudice, which the Court need not approve under current Second Circuit case law. See Cheeks, 796 F.3d at 201 n.2.. (as further set forth herein). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 11/21/2019) (kv)
|
|
Filing
46
OPINION AND ORDER re: 31 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Christina Santi. For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff's motion for leave to file her proposed third amended complaint is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 31. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 1/22/2019) (rro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
