Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe
||Malibu Media, LLC
||April 13, 2018
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||XX Out of State
||Kevin Nathaniel Fox
||Andrew L. Carter
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 20, 2018
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ORDER granting 9 Motion Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference. The plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena, prior to a Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Malibu may immediately serve a Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 subpoena on the ISP, Time Warner Cable, of the John Doe subscriber identified by the IP address 22.214.171.124, to obtain information from which to identify the defendant, spec ifically his or her name, current and permanent address. Malibu is not permitted to subpoena the ISP for the defendant's emailaddresses or telephone number(s). The plaintiff shall attach a copy of this order to the subpoena; and as further set forth herein. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Entry No. 9. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 9/20/2018) (anc)
|July 11, 2018
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 6 Letter Motion for Leave to File Document. For the reasons set forth above, the plaintiffs request for permission to file a motion seeking leave to serve limited, immediate discovery on the defendant's ISP, that is, Time Warner Cable, Docket Entry No. 6, is granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 7/11/2018) (anc)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?