Jacobs et al v. City of New York et al
Plaintiff: Jarzette Jacobs and Ebony Brewton-Austin
Defendant: City of New York, Djafar Tsaabbast, Daniel Decario and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Case Number: 1:2018cv03275
Filed: April 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Vernon S. Broderick
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER: It has been reported to the Court that the parties in this case have reached a settlement agreement. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 7/18/2022) (kv)
January 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER: ORDERED that the parties submit a joint status update on or before March 24, 2022. The joint submission should provide updates regarding (1) the status of Defendants' retention of an expert and the expert's analysis; (2) where the parties stand regarding settlement; and (3) the status of non-expert paper discovery. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 1/14/2022) (rro)
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER granting 52 Letter Motion to Stay re: 52 JOINT LETTER MOTION to Stay Discovery and Status Report addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Brian Francolla dated November 30, 2021. APPLICATION GRANTED. The stay is extended until January 11, 2022, but the parties are informed that no further extensions of the stay will be granted. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 12/1/2021) (kv)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER: granting 50 Letter Motion to Stay re: 50 JOINT LETTER MOTION to Stay Discovery and Status Report. addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Baree N. Fett dated September 30, 2021. Application Granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 10/01/2021) (ama)
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER granting 44 Letter Motion to Stay re: 44 JOINT LETTER MOTION to Stay discovery and status report addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Brian Francolla dated February 26, 2021. APPLICATION GRANTED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 3/1/2021) (cf)
December 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER granting 41 Letter Motion to Stay. APPLICATION GRANTED. SO ORDERED. The parties are directed to file a joint status report on or before February 26, 2021. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 12/1/2020) (rro)
October 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting 38 Letter Motion to Stay. APPLICATION GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 10/2/2020) (rro)
March 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER granting 34 Letter Motion to Stay. APPLICATION GRANTED. SO ORDERED. The parties shall file a status update by June 30, 2020. The post-discovery conference scheduled for April 3, 2020 is adjourned sine die. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 3/24/2020) (rro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jacobs et al v. City of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jarzette Jacobs
Represented By: Baree Nichole Fett
Represented By: Gabriel Paul Harvis
Represented By: Jeffrey Adam Rothman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ebony Brewton-Austin
Represented By: Baree Nichole Fett
Represented By: Gabriel Paul Harvis
Represented By: Jeffrey Adam Rothman
Represented By: Baree Nichole Fett
Represented By: Gabriel Paul Harvis
Represented By: Jeffrey Adam Rothman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Djafar Tsaabbast
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Decario
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?