Brown v. New York City Police Department et al
| Noel L. Brown |
| New York City Police Department, Fifth Precinct New York County, Anthony Kempinski, Kim Li, William Doyle, Andrew Oliver, Alan Lee, Dillon John Doe, John Doe, Grissel Lachhman, Afsi Khot, Legal Aid Society, Rebecca Dunnan, New York State Department of Motor Vehicle, New York City Department Of Corrections, New York City Board of Corrections, Manhattan Detention Complex and Rikers Island Facility |
| 1:2018cv03287 |
| April 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
ORDER denying 98 Motion for Reconsideration re 98 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 97 Amended Judgment. filed by Noel L. Brown, 100 MOTION for Extension of Time to File. filed by Noel L. Brown ; denying 100 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Accordingly, Brown's motions are denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at ECF Nos. 98 and 100. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 12/20/2023) (ate)
|
|
Filing
97
CLERK'S AMENDED JUDGMENT amending 96 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment in favor of Captain Firsov, City of New York, Covinton, Dail, Afsi Khot, Anthony Kempinski, Kim Li, Rebecca Dunnan, William Doyle against Noel L. Brown. It is hereb y ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated May 2, 2023, pursuant to the mandate from the Second Circuit, see ECF No. 94, an amended judgment is entered clarifying that the dismissal of Brown's false arrest claims (see ECF No. 66 at 4 - 5 and ECF No. 81 at 2 - 3) under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), is without prejudice, while the dismissal of his other claims is with prejudice. Brown's motion for summary judgment in this c losed case is denied as procedurally improper, given that the case has been dismissed. See this Court's previous orders in this case at ECF Nos. 66, 81, 88. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 5/2/2023) (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Package) (km)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER denying 86 Motion for Reconsideration re 86 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 2 Complaint,. filed by Noel L. Brown. For the foregoing reasons, Brown's motion to reopen is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the m otion at Docket Number 86. The Clerk of Court is also directed to mail a copy of this order, the Court's March 31, 2021 Opinion and Order at Docket Number 81, and the Clerk's Judgment at Docket Number 82 to the Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court is directed to contact the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and obtain an Attorney Control Number to put on the envelope addressed to the Plaintiff.. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 6/23/2022) (ate)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER granting 68 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File ; granting 68 Letter Motion to Stay. Granted. The moving defendants' proposed briefing schedule is adopted, and discovery in this matter is stayed pending the Court's resol ution of the anticipated motion to dismiss. All existing deadlines and conference dates in this matter are adjourned sine die. So Ordered. Counsel for defendants are directed to mail a copy of this order to the plaintiff. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 6/22/2020) (js)
|
|
Filing
66
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 42 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. filed by Captain Firsov, Kim Li, Anthony Kempinski, City of New York, 58 MOTION that the Court strike out the reference to the criminal conviction on 3/27/19. filed by Noel L. Brown. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion to strike is DENIED. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend, provided that he does so within sixty days of the date of this Opinion and Order. If no amended complaint is filed by that date, this action will be dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Numbers 42 and 58. Counsel for Defendants are directed to mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to Plaintiff within seven days. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 4/9/2020) (js) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
64
MEMO ENDORSEMENT denying 61 Motion for Protective Order. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff's Letter-Motion for a protective order (ECF No. 61) is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF No. 61. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 11/19/2019) (rro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
