Theobroma BV v. Federal Insurance Company et al
| Theobroma BV |
| Federal Insurance Company, The Continental Insurance Company, AGCS Marine Insurance Company, XL Catlin Specialty Insurance Company, Endurance American Insurance Company, AXA Corporate Solutions Assurance, Allianz Benelux SA, Allianz Versicherungs AG and AIG Europe Limited |
| 1:2018cv03643 |
| April 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Marine |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 635 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be c onsummated within sixty (60) days of the date hereof. Any application to reopen must be filed within sixty (60) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised t hat if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next sixty(60) days with a request that the agreement be "so ordered" by the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 2/5/2020) (js)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
