Torres v. City of New York et al
| Lissette Torres |
| City Of New York, New York City Police Department and Jane and John Does |
| 1:2018cv03644 |
| April 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Lorna G. Schofield |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
148
OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's objections are overruled and the Report's recommendation to grant in part the Fee Motion is adopted. Plaintiff is awarded fees of $294,229.65 and costs in the amount of $17,193.32, for a total of $311,422.97. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 8/20/2020) (rj)
|
|
Filing
139
OPINION AND ORDER ON ATTORNEYS' FEES APPLICATION FROM PLAINTIFF IN CONNECTION WITH SETTLEMENT re: 129 MOTION for Attorney Fees , Costs and Expenses filed by Lissette Torres. Accordingly, I find that Plaintiff is enti tled to attorneys' fees in the amount of $289,859 and costs in the amount of $17,193.32. The attorneys' fees are computed as follows: 1293.65 hours x.75 = 970.24 hours. To account for the inefficient staffing, 55% of the 970.24 hours (533.23 hours) are compensated at the rate of $250 per hour; 15% (145.53 hours) are compensated at $600 per hour; 15% (145.53 hours) are compensated at $375 per hour; and 15% (145.53 hours) are compensated at $100 per hour. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 5/18/2020) (mro)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER: The deadline for Plaintiff's application for fees with supporting records (January 10, 2020), The City's opposition, if any, is due by January 31, 2020, and Plaintiff's reply, if any, is due by February 28, 2020. SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 1/10/2020, Responses due by 1/31/2020, Replies due by 2/28/2020.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 12/27/2019) (va)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER: This case has been referred to me for Specific Non-Dispositive Motion/Dispute, Attorney's fees and costs (docket no. 126). Plaintiff's application for fees with supporting records due January 10, 2020. Opposition due January 31, 2020. ( Motions due by 1/10/2020., Responses due by 1/31/2020) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 12/18/2019) (mro)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall submit a joint letter, by December 16, 2019, advising the Court of the status of settlement discussions regarding attorney's fees, mutual cooperation and mutual release. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 12/11/2019) (rro)
|
|
Filing
71
OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's partial motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The discrimination and hostile work environment claims under Title VII, NYSHRL and NYCHRL (Counts Two, Four, Five, Six, Eight and Ten) are dismissed . For clarity, the retaliation claims (Counts One, Three, Seven and Nine), which were not a subject of this motion, remain. Should Plaintiff wish to seek leave to replead, Plaintiff shall file within 14 days a redlined version of a proposed amende d complaint, showing changes from the current Complaint, together with a letter application, not to exceed three pages, explaining how the legal deficiencies identified in this Opinion have been cured. No pre-motion conference nor any response is necessary unless requested by the Court. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Docket Number 39. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 4/22/2019) (ks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
