Leznik v. Lincoln Financial Advisors Corporation
| Jeffrey Lesnik |
| Lincoln Financial Advisors Corporation |
| 1:2018cv03656 |
| April 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Kings |
| Paul A. Crotty |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 11 U.S.C. ยง 525 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
140
ORDER: The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in principle in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without costs and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court' ;s calendar, provided the application to restore the action is made within sixty (60) days of this Order. Any application to reopen filed after sixty (60) days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis. Any pending motions are DISMISSED as moot, and all conferences and deadlines are CANCELLED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 8/11/2021) (jca)
|
|
Filing
131
ORDER re: 127 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion filed by Lincoln Financial Advisors Corporation, 121 MOTION in Limine . filed by Jeffrey Lesnik, The parties will have until Tuesday, August 3, 2021 to respond to the motions in limine at Dkt. No. 121 and Dkt. No. 127. The motions will be argued and decided at the pretrial conference. SO ORDERED., Responses due by 8/3/2021. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 7/30/2021) (rj)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER: The Court held a conference with the parties on March 17, 2021. At that conference, the Court scheduled a briefing schedule for Plaintiff's motion on sanctions. Plaintiff's opening brief is due April 1, 2021, Defendant' s opposition is due April 8, 2021, and Plaintiff's reply is due April 12, 2021. In light of this briefing and the parties' agreement for an adjournment of trial, the jury trial previously scheduled for April 5, 2021 is ADJOURNED to Aug ust 9, 2021. Parties shall submit the joint pretrial order by July 21, 2021. A final pretrial conference is scheduled for August 5, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 4/1/2021. Responses due by 4/8/2021. Replies due by 4/12/2021. Ready for Trial by 8/9/2021. Pretrial Order due by 7/21/2021. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/5/2021 at 02:00 PM before Judge Lewis J. Liman.) (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 3/18/2021) (va)
|
|
Filing
86
OPINION & ORDER re: 63 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Lincoln Financial Advisors Corporation; 72 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Jeffrey Lesnik. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PA RT and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Dkt. Nos. 63, 72. A status conference is scheduled for June 22, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. SO ORDERED. ( Status Conference set for 6/22/2020 at 03:00 PM before Judge Lewis J. Liman.) (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 6/9/2020) (va)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER granting 55 LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference (Pre-motion Conference) addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Diane Windholz dated February 12, 2020. Document filed by Lincoln Financial Advisors Corporation. The conference previously schedul ed for February 27, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. is adjourned to February 28, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. Plaintiff's response, if any, is still due by February 13, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Pre-Motion Conference set for 2/28/2020 at 09:30 AM before Judge Lewis J. Liman). (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 2/13/2020). (rjm)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER: It is hereby: ORDERED that the pre-motion conference previously scheduled for February 27, 2020 at 4:15 p.m. shall take place on that date at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 15C of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 500 P earl Street, New York, New York. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit a joint letter to the Court updating the Court on the status of the case no later than February 20, 2020. SO ORDERED. ( Pre-Motion Conference set for 2/27/2020 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 15C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Lewis J. Liman.) (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 2/10/2020) (va)
|
|
Filing
50
OPINION & ORDER re: 44 MOTION to Amend/Correct the Complaint. filed by Jeffrey Lesnik. Plaintiffs motion to amend the Complaint is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is instructed to close the motion at Dkt. 44. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 11/20/2019) (ks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Leznik v. Lincoln Financial Advisors Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jeffrey Lesnik | |
| Represented By: | Gregory S. Antollino |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lincoln Financial Advisors Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
