Stulz Air Technology Systems, Inc. v. George J. Figliolia et al
Stulz Air Technology Systems, Inc. |
George J. Figliolia, Yitzchok Stareshefsky, Steven Figliolia, Ronald Figliolia, Joanne Garcia, Louis Figliolia, John Krupa, Fiduciary Trust International of Delaware, GJF Construction Corp., Builders Group Construction Corp., G Builders LLC, BG Development LLC, BG Construction LLC and John Does 1 through 5 |
1:2018cv03694 |
April 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Edgardo Ramos |
Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 86 ORDER: granting 85 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. The request is GRANTED. If settlement is not reached, motions for summary judgment must be filed by no later than February 19, 2021. Any oppositions must be filed no later than March 22, 2021. Any replies must be filed by no later than April 5, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 2/02/2021) (ama) |
Filing 84 ORDER granting 83 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. The parties' deadline to file summary judgment motions or cross-motions is extended to February 5, 2021. Any oppositions are due March 8, 2021. Any replies are due March 22, 2021. The application is granted. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 1/18/2021) (mro) |
Filing 80 ORDER:The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's letter dated November 5, 2020 regarding its intended summary judgment motion, and Defendants' letter dated November 20, 2020 in response. Docs. 76, 79. The court hereby sets the following briefi ng schedule for the parties' motion(s) for summary judgment: December 23, 2020: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is due. If Defendants choose to cross-move for summary judgment, they must also do so by this date. January 25, 2021: De fendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is due. If Defendants cross-move for summary judgment, Plaintiff's Opposition to that motion must be submitted by this date. February 8, 2021: The parties' reply briefs, if any, must be submitted by this date. (Cross Motions due by 12/23/2020., Motions due by 12/23/2020., Responses due by 1/25/2021, Replies due by 2/8/2021.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 11/23/2020) (rro) |
Filing 73 ORDER: On March 5, 2020, the Court held a Show Cause Hearing at which the Court ordered the defendants to produce certain documents requested by Stulz. No action has occurred in that case since that time. Accordingly, the parties are directed t o file a joint status report with the Court by November 1, 2020. Failure to comply with this order could result in sanctions up to and including dismissal for failure to prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 10/2/2020) (rro) |
Filing 66 ORDER denying 55 Letter Motion for Discovery. On October 16, 2019, Plaintiffs asked the Court to enter a discovery protective order on its behalf. Doc. 55. For the reasons set forth on the record during the December 6, 2019 discovery conference, the request for a protective order is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 55. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 1/27/2020) (mro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.