Woodhams et al v. Pfizer Inc.
| Timothy A. Woodhams, Elizebeth Hinz, Ronald De Clue, John Covello, Joshua Hoaglund, Cynthia Carrillo, Oscar De Leon, Daniel Paul, Robert Trepper and Daniel Utterback |
| Pfizer Inc. |
| 1:2018cv03990 |
| May 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| J. Paul Oetken |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
OPINION AND ORDER re: 109 MOTION to Strike Document No. [94 and 95] Plaintiff's Unauthorized "Offer of Proof". filed by GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) LLC., 91 MOTION to Certify Class Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel. filed by Oscar De Leon, Timothy A. Woodhams, Robert Trepper, Cynthia Carrillo, John Covello, Daniel Utterback, Daniel Paul, 98 MOTION To Exclude The Op inions Of Joel E. Lesch . filed by GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) LLC., 102 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) LLC. For the foregoing reason s: Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; Plaintiffs' motion for class certification and appointment of class counsel is DENIED; Defendant's motion to exclude the opinions of Joel E. Lesch is DENIED as moot; Defendant's motion to strike Plaintiff's offer of proof is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at ECF Nos. 91, 98, 102, and 109. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 3/21/24) (yv)
|
|
Filing
70
AGREED CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER: The parties to this Agreed Confidentiality Order have agreed to the terms of this Order; accordingly, it is ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 5/19/2022) (ate)
|
|
Filing
60
OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Pfizer's motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The unjust enrichment claims of Plaintiffs Covello, de Clue, Hinz, Paul, and Woodhams are dismissed; the motion is denied with res pect to the remaining claims. Pfizer's motion to strike the nationwide class allegations is DENIED. Pfizer shall file an answer to the remaining claims within 21 days after the date of this opinion and order. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 11/15/2021) (js)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER: Plaintiffs now move that the Court lift the stay. (Dkt. No. 52.) That motion is granted. The case is reinstated for further proceedings, and Defendants motion to dismiss and motion to strike are deemed reactivated. The Clerk of Court is directed to lift the stay of this action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 4/17/2020) (js)
|
|
Filing
47
OPINION AND ORDER re: 36 MOTION to Stay Action. filed by Elizebeth Hinz, Oscar De Leon, Cynthia Carrillo, Ronald De Clue, Timothy A. Woodhams, John Covello, Robert Trepper, Daniel Paul, Daniel Utterback, 19 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint. filed by Pfizer Inc., 23 MOTION to Strike Document No. 4 (Nationwide Class Claims) filed by Pfizer Inc. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motion to stay is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall notify the Court within 14 days of any disposition of the class certification motion pending in the Illinois Action. The pending motion to dismiss and motion to strike are dismissed without prejudice to reactivation in the event that the stay is lifted. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Numbers 19, 23, and 36 and to mark this case as stayed. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 3/29/2019) (cf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
