SKAT v. The Bradley London Pension Plan et al
Plaintiff: SKAT
Defendant: The Bradley London Pension Plan and Doston Bradley
Case Number: 1:2018cv04047
Filed: May 4, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of U.S.
Presiding Judge: Lewis A. Kaplan
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 207 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER in case 1:18-cv-04047-LAK; denying (856) Motion for Prohibit the Deposition of Nigel Rackham or Exclude His Testimony From Evidence re: (856 in 1:18-md-02865-LAK) MOTION Prohibit the Deposition of Nigel Rackham or Exclud e His Testimony From Evidence . in case 1:18-md-02865-LAK. ENDORSEMENT: This applies to all cases. Certain defendants move to preclude the deposition of Nigel Rackham on the ground that plaintiff proposes to take it after the discovery de adline. Dkt 856. Their argument hinges on the premise that the Rackham deposition was not "pending" as of the close of discovery on December 3, 2021, and that there is no justification for creating an exception for plaintiff's benef it, especially given what movants characterize as plaintiff's lack of due diligence. Movants' interpretation of the word "pending" is not implausible. But it is not the only plausible interpretation. For example, the Oxford Eng lish Dictionary gives, as one definition, this: "While awaiting; until the occurrence or appearance of; until." In that sense, the Rackham deposition remained pending as of December 3, 2021 for the simple reason that it had not yet occurred. Accordingly, the motion is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 8/23/22) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-md-02865-LAK et al. (yv)
June 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 187 PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 23 (Order on Motion for Foreign Judicial Assistance): granting (598) Motion for Discovery in case 1:18-md-02865-LAK. In view of the completion of the Rule 30(b)(6) depositions of plaintiff and the uncertain ability to obtai n testimony from Mr. Jeppesen and Ms. Zester, the motion of certain defendants for international judicial assistance to obtain evidence from the Kingdom of Denmark (18-md-2865, Dkt 598) is granted. Movants shall submit proposed execution copies of l etters of request to chambers for review and signature. The Clerk shall spread this ruling to all cases identified in the caption of Dkt 598. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 6/04/2021) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-md-02865-LAK et al. (ama)
April 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 178 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (173) Motion for Issuance of a Request for International Judicial Assistance to Obtain Evidence in the United Kingdom (173 in 1:18-cv-04047-LAK, 131 in 1:18-cv-04049-LAK, 132 in 1:18-cv-04050-LAK, 131 in 1:18-cv-04051 -LAK, 131 in 1:18-cv-04052-LAK, 132 in 1:18-cv-04430-LAK, 144 in 1:18-cv-04434-LAK, 131 in 1:18-cv-04522-LAK, 132 in 1:18-cv-04531-LAK, 132 in 1:18-cv-04536-LAK, 130 in 1:18-cv-04538-LAK, 131 in 1:18-cv-04541-LAK, 131 in 1:18-cv-04543-LAK, 130 in 1:1 8-cv-04767-LAK, 130 in 1:18-cv-04770-LAK, 116 in 1:18-cv-04771-LAK, 157 in 1:18-cv-04833-LAK, 132 in 1:18-cv-04890-LAK, 132 in 1:18-cv-04892-LAK, 133 in 1:18-cv-04894-LAK, 133 in 1:18-cv-04896-LAK, 133 in 1:18-cv-04898-LAK, 143 in 1:18-cv-04899-LAK, 133 in 1:18-cv-04900-LAK, 131 in 1:18-cv-05045-LAK, 267 in 1:18-cv-05053-LAK, 134 in 1:18-cv-05057-LAK, 136 in 1:18-cv-05147-LAK, 136 in 1:18-cv-05150-LAK, 138 in 1:18-cv-05151-LAK, 135 in 1:18-cv-05158-LAK, 135 in 1:18-cv-05164-LAK, 135 in 1:18-cv-0 5180-LAK, 135 in 1:18-cv-05183-LAK, 141 in 1:18-cv-05185-LAK, 141 in 1:18-cv-05186-LAK, 135 in 1:18-cv-05188-LAK, 135 in 1:18-cv-05189-LAK, 141 in 1:18-cv-05190-LAK, 135 in 1:18-cv-05192-LAK, 135 in 1:18-cv-05193-LAK, 141 in 1:18-cv-05194-LAK, 135 in 1:18-cv-05299-LAK, 131 in 1:18-cv-05300-LAK, 135 in 1:18-cv-05305-LAK, 131 in 1:18-cv-05307-LAK, 135 in 1:18-cv-05308-LAK, 135 in 1:18-cv-05309-LAK, 182 in 1:18-cv-05374-LAK, 153 in 1:18-cv-07824-LAK, 153 in 1:18-cv-07827-LAK, 152 in 1:18-cv-07828-L AK, 152 in 1:18-cv-07829-LAK, 165 in 1:18-cv-08655-LAK, 567 in 1:18-md-02865-LAK, 144 in 1:18-cv-09434-LAK, 145 in 1:18-cv-09439-LAK, 143 in 1:18-cv-09489-LAK, 144 in 1:18-cv-09490-LAK, 143 in 1:18-cv-09491-LAK, 130 in 1:18-cv-09492-LAK, 127 in 1:18- cv-09497-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-09498-LAK, 127 in 1:18-cv-09505-LAK, 129 in 1:18-cv-09507-LAK, 131 in 1:18-cv-09511-LAK, 129 in 1:18-cv-09515-LAK, 130 in 1:18-cv-09549-LAK, 141 in 1:18-cv-09552-LAK, 163 in 1:18-cv-09565-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-09570-LAK, 12 8 in 1:18-cv-09494-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-09587-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-09588-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-09589-LAK, 129 in 1:18-cv-09590-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-09650-LAK, 126 in 1:18-cv-09665-LAK, 124 in 1:18-cv-09666-LAK, 125 in 1:18-cv-09668-LAK, 124 in 1:18-cv-096 69-LAK, 232 in 1:18-cv-09797-LAK, 169 in 1:18-cv-09836-LAK, 168 in 1:18-cv-09837-LAK, 162 in 1:18-cv-09838-LAK, 168 in 1:18-cv-09839-LAK, 168 in 1:18-cv-09840-LAK, 171 in 1:18-cv-09841-LAK, 136 in 1:18-cv-10028-LAK, 129 in 1:18-cv-10030-LAK, 129 in 1 :18-cv-10031-LAK, 129 in 1:18-cv-10032-LAK, 130 in 1:18-cv-10035-LAK, 126 in 1:18-cv-10036-LAK, 130 in 1:18-cv-10039-LAK, 129 in 1:18-cv-10049-LAK, 127 in 1:18-cv-10060-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-10061-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-10062-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-10063-LAK , 128 in 1:18-cv-10064-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-10065-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-10066-LAK, 123 in 1:18-cv-10067-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-10069-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-10070-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-10071-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-10073-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-10074-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv -10076-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-10077-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-10080-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-10082-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-10083-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-10086-LAK, 124 in 1:18-cv-10088-LAK, 121 in 1:18-cv-10090-LAK, 123 in 1:18-cv-10091-LAK, 126 in 1:18-cv-10092-LAK, 126 in 1:18-cv-10093-LAK, 127 in 1:18-cv-10094-LAK, 123 in 1:18-cv-10095-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-10096-LAK, 128 in 1:18-cv-10098-LAK, 119 in 1:18-cv-10099-LAK, 225 in 1:18-cv-10100-LAK, 153 in 1:18-cv-10118-LAK, 158 in 1:18-cv-10119-LAK, 137 in 1:18-cv-10122 -LAK, 136 in 1:18-cv-10123-LAK, 133 in 1:18-cv-10124-LAK, 138 in 1:18-cv-10125-LAK, 137 in 1:18-cv-10126-LAK, 135 in 1:18-cv-10127-LAK, 135 in 1:18-cv-10129-LAK, 157 in 1:18-cv-10130-LAK, 136 in 1:18-cv-10137-LAK, 130 in 1:18-cv-10133-LAK, 129 in 1:1 8-cv-10134-LAK, 129 in 1:18-cv-10135-LAK, 132 in 1:18-cv-10136-LAK, 140 in 1:19-cv-01781-LAK, 142 in 1:19-cv-01783-LAK, 140 in 1:19-cv-01785-LAK, 143 in 1:19-cv-01788-LAK, 143 in 1:19-cv-01791-LAK, 143 in 1:19-cv-01792-LAK, 139 in 1:19-cv-01794-LAK, 79 in 1:19-cv-01795-LAK, 143 in 1:19-cv-01798-LAK, 143 in 1:19-cv-01800-LAK, 143 in 1:19-cv-01801-LAK, 143 in 1:19-cv-01803-LAK, 139 in 1:19-cv-01806-LAK, 142 in 1:19-cv-01808-LAK, 139 in 1:19-cv-01809-LAK, 143 in 1:19-cv-01810-LAK, 143 in 1:19-cv-01 812-LAK, 143 in 1:19-cv-01813-LAK, 143 in 1:19-cv-01815-LAK, 143 in 1:19-cv-01818-LAK, 115 in 1:19-cv-01865-LAK, 122 in 1:19-cv-01866-LAK, 122 in 1:19-cv-01867-LAK, 126 in 1:19-cv-01868-LAK, 131 in 1:19-cv-01869-LAK, 142 in 1:19-cv-01870-LAK, 126 in 1:19-cv-01871-LAK, 119 in 1:19-cv-01873-LAK, 114 in 1:19-cv-01893-LAK, 124 in 1:19-cv-01894-LAK, 118 in 1:19-cv-01895-LAK, 122 in 1:19-cv-01896-LAK, 117 in 1:19-cv-01898-LAK, 117 in 1:19-cv-01904-LAK, 133 in 1:19-cv-01906-LAK, 135 in 1:19-cv-01911-LA K, 141 in 1:19-cv-01918-LAK, 142 in 1:19-cv-01922-LAK, 133 in 1:19-cv-01924-LAK, 138 in 1:19-cv-01926-LAK, 142 in 1:19-cv-01928-LAK, 142 in 1:19-cv-01929-LAK, 115 in 1:19-cv-01930-LAK, 143 in 1:19-cv-01931-LAK, 151 in 1:19-cv-10713-LAK). ENDORSEMENT : Motion granted. Plaintiff should submit original requests to chambers for signature. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 4/18/2021) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-md-02865-LAK et al, as per Chambers. (mro) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. Modified on 4/19/2021 (mro).
April 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 177 PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 20 (Ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for a Protective Order) granting in part and denying in part (557) Letter Motion for Discovery in case 1:18-md-02865-LAK. Plaintiff seeks a protective order in substance striking o r limiting certain topics listed in defendants' notice of Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of the plaintiff Dkt 557. The motion is granted in part and denied in part as follows: 1. Local Civ. R. 33.3(c) precludes contention interrogatorie s until the conclusion of all other discovery. The rule recognizes that parties frequently are not in a position to give full statements of their contentions or the facts upon which they rely to support them until discovery is complete. I t is intended to preclude expensive jousting over what, prior to the close of other discovery), often can be little more than a party's preliminary view of its position. While each side is entitled to know the other's contentions i n advance of trial, no one is entitled to what often amounts to a progress report. Accordingly, insofar as Topics 1, 5, 6, 22, 23 and 24 of defendants' 30(b)(6) notice seek the factual basis for contentions, they are stricken without pr ejudice to exploring these questions by interrogatory at an appropriate time. 2. The time period for the 30(b)(6) depositions, unless otherwise specified, shall be March 1, 2010 to the present. 3. The request to limit the time period cover ed by Topic 10 is denied. 4. Plaintiff seeks to strike Topics 12 and 13. Topic 12 is vastly overbroad and therefore is stricken. The request is denied with respect to Topic l3. 5. Plaintiff's request to strike Topic 15 is denied, large ly for the reason advanced by defendants. 6. So much of Topic 21 as seeks testimony concerning SKAT's "mechanism for enforcing that revocation" is stricken. The fact that defendants find that of interest does not make it relev ant. Indeed, that request seems intended, in part, to attempt to pry into plaintiff's litigation strategy in foreign countries. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 4/12/2021) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-md-02865-LAK et al., as per Chambers. (mro) Modified on 4/12/2021 (mro).
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 166 Revised Amended Stipulated Protective Order Governing Confidentiality of Discovery Materials in case 1:18-cv-04047-LAK; granting (467) Letter Motion for a revised protective order in case 1:18-md-02865-LAK. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 11/6/2020) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-md-02865-LAK et al. (Mohan, Andrew)
June 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 133 MEMO ENDORSEMENT in case 1:18-cv-04047-LAK; granting (330) MOTION for Discovery Re: Issuance of a Request for International Judicial Assistance to Obtain Evidence in the Cayman Islands in case 1:18-md-02865-LAK. ENDORSEMENT: Granted. The Court tod ay has granted this and another motion (Dkt 327), each of which contemplates the issuance of multiple requests for international legal assistance, some to the British Virgin Islands and some to the Cayman Islands. Each motion attached electronic v ersions of the proposed requests as exhibits. No hard copies are available to the Court for signature. Plaintiff shall contact the Court's Deputy Clerk, Mr. Richard Wilson, and provide him with as many hard signature copies as may be required both for filing in this Court and for provision to foreign courts. Mr. Wilson will forward the hard copies to the Court by courier for signature and return. Upon receipt, he will file one signed copy of each request and provide plaintiff with as many signed copies as may be required. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 6/30/2020) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-md-02865-LAK et al. (jca)
March 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 113 AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING CONFIDENTIALITY OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 3/5/2020) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-md-02865-LAK et al. (jwh)
January 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 108 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting granting (251) Motion for Discovery in case 1:18-md-02865-LAK and all related cases. ENDORSEMENT: Granted. Movant to submit execution copy of request. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 1/22/2020) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-md-02865-LAK et al. (jwh)
January 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 80 MEMORANDUM OPINION: The defendants' motion to dismiss the complaints is denied in all respects. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 1/9/2019) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-md-02865-LAK et al.(jca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SKAT v. The Bradley London Pension Plan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SKAT
Represented By: Sarah Loomis Cave
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Bradley London Pension Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doston Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?