Johnston v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
Lorna Killian Johnston |
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Pfizer Inc, St. Marys Medical Center and Dignity Health Medical Center |
1:2018cv04057 |
May 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Denise L. Cote |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND OPINION.....For the forgoing reasons, it is herebyORDERED that any claims against St. Marys Medical Center and Dignity Health Medical Center are severed from this action. The remaining defendants in this action are Bristol-Mey ers Squibb Co. and Pfizer, Inc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs May 17 motion to remand this action is granted in part. The claims against St. Marys Medical Center and Dignity Health Medical Center are remanded to the Superior Court of Ca lifornia for the County of San Francisco. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that claims asserted against defendants Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co. and Pfizer, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment for defendants Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company and Pfizer, Inc. and close the above-captioned case. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 6/14/2018) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02754-DLC, 1:18-cv-04057-DLC(gr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.