Interceptor Ignition Interlocks, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Plaintiff: Interceptor Ignition Interlocks, Inc.
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Case Number: 1:2018cv04289
Filed: May 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Katherine B. Forrest
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER: On September 18, 2023, the undersigned was referred to this matter for general pretrial supervision. Noting that it has been nearly a year since the last status report (Dkt. No. 63), the Court directs the parties to file a joint letter regarding the status of arbitration by Friday, February 9, 2024. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary Stein on 1/29/2024) (vfr)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER: The Court was advised that an arbitration had been commenced on March 3, 2020. Since that time, the Court has heard nothing from the parties. The plaintiff shall advise of the status of proceedings by February 28, 2022 or the case will be dismissed and closed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 2/11/2022) (ama)
July 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER: Within 21 days of this Order, pursuant to the Court's February 4, 2020 Order, (Doc. 47), defendant shall submit an affidavit attesting to the commencement or non-commencement of arbitration. If plaintiff has not commenced arbitration, defendant's affidavit shall be accompanied by an application to dismiss the case for failure to prosecute. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 7/23/2020) (jwh)
March 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER re: 17 FIRST MOTION to Compel Arbitration pursuant to FAA, 9 USC 3,4: Defendant AT&T's motion (Doc. 17) is GRANTED to the extent it seeks to compel arbitration and stay proceedings pending the outcome of arbitrati on. It is unnecessary for the Court to reach any other grounds asserted in the motion. The parties are ordered to report to the Court on the status of the arbitration as of June 30, 2019 within 14 days thereafter. Defendant's motion (Doc. 37) for oral argument is DENIED as moot. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 3/7/2019) (jwh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Interceptor Ignition Interlocks, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Interceptor Ignition Interlocks, Inc.
Represented By: Mark W. Stoutenburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Represented By: Matthew Joseph Fedor
Represented By: Andrew Bradford Joseph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?