Interceptor Ignition Interlocks, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Interceptor Ignition Interlocks, Inc. |
AT&T Mobility Services LLC |
1:2018cv04289 |
May 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Katherine B. Forrest |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 ORDER: On September 18, 2023, the undersigned was referred to this matter for general pretrial supervision. Noting that it has been nearly a year since the last status report (Dkt. No. 63), the Court directs the parties to file a joint letter regarding the status of arbitration by Friday, February 9, 2024. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary Stein on 1/29/2024) (vfr) |
Filing 56 ORDER: The Court was advised that an arbitration had been commenced on March 3, 2020. Since that time, the Court has heard nothing from the parties. The plaintiff shall advise of the status of proceedings by February 28, 2022 or the case will be dismissed and closed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 2/11/2022) (ama) |
Filing 54 ORDER: Within 21 days of this Order, pursuant to the Court's February 4, 2020 Order, (Doc. 47), defendant shall submit an affidavit attesting to the commencement or non-commencement of arbitration. If plaintiff has not commenced arbitration, defendant's affidavit shall be accompanied by an application to dismiss the case for failure to prosecute. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 7/23/2020) (jwh) |
Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER re: 17 FIRST MOTION to Compel Arbitration pursuant to FAA, 9 USC 3,4: Defendant AT&T's motion (Doc. 17) is GRANTED to the extent it seeks to compel arbitration and stay proceedings pending the outcome of arbitrati on. It is unnecessary for the Court to reach any other grounds asserted in the motion. The parties are ordered to report to the Court on the status of the arbitration as of June 30, 2019 within 14 days thereafter. Defendant's motion (Doc. 37) for oral argument is DENIED as moot. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 3/7/2019) (jwh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Interceptor Ignition Interlocks, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Interceptor Ignition Interlocks, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Mark W. Stoutenburg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services LLC | |
Represented By: | Matthew Joseph Fedor |
Represented By: | Andrew Bradford Joseph |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.