Doe v. Skyline Automotive Inc. et al
| Jane Doe |
| Skyline Automotive Inc., Skyline Automobiles Inc., Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Freddy Velez, Kevin Primus and Anthony Namias |
| 1:2018cv04418 |
| May 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Andrew L. Carter |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
OPINION AND ORDER re: 16 FIRST MOTION for Confidentiality Plaintiff to proceed annonymously filed by Jane Doe. Plaintiff's allegations of sexual assault, sexual harassment, and discrimination are highly sensitive and of a person al nature. Plaintiff's desire to proceed anonymously is understandable, and that desire is one that unfortunately prevents many victims of sexual violence from sharing their story and seeking justice for the harms inflicted upon them. Although Plaintiff's allegations are highly sensitive and of a personal nature, in this case, Sealed Plaintiff factors two through ten either fail to support or weigh against granting Plaintiff's Motion. Thus, Plaintiff has failed to satisfy her burden. For the aforementioned reasons, Plaintiff's Motion for Confidentiality is hereby DENIED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 3/21/2019) (ne)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
