Varon v. Hakmon
Plaintiff: Anat Varon
Defendant: Sharon Hakmon
Case Number: 1:2018cv04426
Filed: May 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of U.S.
Presiding Judge: Robert W. Sweet
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER: A final pretrial conference having been held on May 25, 2022, with counsel for all parties participating and the Court having reviewed the April'12, 2018 letter from Jeffrey H. Zegen to Alan Merovitch, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the April 12, 2018 letter from Jeffrey H. Zegen to Alan Merovitch is not precluded from admission under Fed. R. Evid. 408. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 5/26/2022) (jca)
May 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial of this matter will commence on June 7, 2022, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 23A, and will continue day-to-day until completed. SO ORDERED. ( Jury Trial set for 6/7/2022 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 23A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Sidney H. Stein.) (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 5/13/22) (yv)
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER granting 73 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 5/5/2022) (jca)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The joint pretrial order, proposed jury charges, any motions in limine, and, if the parties wish, proposed voir dire, are due on May 6, 2022; 2. Responses to any motions are due by May 13, 2022; 2. The final pre trial conference will take place on May 25, 2022, at 11 :00 a.m. in Courtroom 23A; 2. The trial of this matter will commence on June 6, 2022, at 9:30 a.m.; and 3. The parties should be aware that although the Court is submitting the jury request f or this trial to begin on June 6, 2022, the trial date may be rescheduled by the Court's Ad Hoc Committee on the Resumption of Jury Trials to another date in the second quarter of 2022. The Court will notify the parties as soon as the fourth quarter trial calendar has been established for trials at the U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. SO ORDERED. (Motions due by 5/6/2022., Pretrial Order due by 5/6/2022., Responses due by 5/13/2022, Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/25/2022 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 23A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Sidney H. Stein., Jury Trial set for 6/6/2022 at 09:30 AM before Judge Sidney H. Stein.) (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 2/1/2022) (jca)
May 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER: A teleconference having been held on May 27, 2021, with counsel for all parties participating, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The trial currently scheduled to begin on June 28, 2021 is adjourned sine die. 2. This case will be submitted to the Court's Ad Hoc Committee on the Resumption of Jury Trials for a trial date in the fourth quarter of 2021. 3. The parties will attend court-annexed mediation per this Court's mediation referral order. 4. The deadlines for the joint pretrial order, proposed jury charges, proposed voir dire, and motions in limine, previously due by May 28, 2021, and for responses to motions in limine, previously due by June 4, 2021, are postponed sine die. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 5/28/2021) (nb)
August 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The trial of this action is adjourned until February 8, 2021, at 9:30 a.m.; 2. The joint pretrial order, proposed jury charges, any motions in limine, and, if the parties wish, proposed voir dire, are due on or be fore January 11, 2021; 3. Responses to any motions in limine are due by January 19, 2021; and 4. The Court does not intend to adjourn this trial until the conclusion of the insurance declaratory judgment action recently filed in the Southern District of New York. This case will proceed to trial on February 8, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. So ordered. Granting 63 FIRST LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference addressed to Judge Sidney H. Stein from Christopher Ryan Clarke dated August 3, 2020. Document filed by Sharon Hakmon. (Jury Trial set for 2/8/2021 at 09:30 AM before Judge Sidney H. Stein). (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 8/6/2020) (rjm)
April 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Defendant shall take the deposition of Mr. Faruqi on or before May 11, 2020. The deposition shall take place via video or telephone and shall last no more than five hours; The joint pretrial order, proposed jury char ges, and, if the parties wish, proposed voir dire andany motions in limine, are due on or before August 17, 2020; Responses to any motions in limine are due on or before August 24, 2020; and The trial of this action by a jury is scheduled for Septemb er 9, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. SO ORDERED., ( Deposition due by 5/11/2020., Motions due by 8/17/2020., Pretrial Order due by 8/17/2020., Responses due by 8/24/2020, Jury Trial set for 9/9/2020 at 09:30 AM before Judge Sidney H. Stein.) (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 4/30/2020) (ama)
March 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER: In light of the uncertainty concerning the COVID-19 virus, the status conference scheduled for March 19, at 11:00 a.m., is adjourned to March 24, 2020, at 11:30 a.m. (Pretrial Conference set for 3/24/2020 at 11:30 AM before Judge Sidney H. Stein.) (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 3/12/2020) (cf)
January 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 54 Letter Motion for Discovery. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's motion for leave to conduct depositions of (1) Structural Engineering Technologies, P.C.; (2) N&S Soil and Concrete Testing or Nari Motwani; (3) AA Inspections & Building Services Inc. or Parbhunath Indardeo; (4) M.A.R. Design Services or Maqsood Ahmed Faruqi; and (5) Richard Ramkeesoon is granted. 2. Due to the concerns reflected by the Court on the record on November 22 , 2019, defendant's motion for leave to re-depose plaintiff Varon is denied. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) ("The court may, for good cause issue an order to protect a party... from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression or undue burden or expense ."). 3. If defendant intends to conduct those five depositions, he shall issue subpoenas to the deponents on or before January 31, 2020. The last day to take depositions shall be March 17, 2020. 4. Defendant is granted leave to retain a "ge otechnical engineering expert who can inspect and report on the soil conditions." (ECF No. 54 at 2.) That report shall be served on defendant on or before March 17, 2020. 5. Plaintiff may depose defendant's "geotechnical engineering expert" on or before April7, 2020. 6. There will be a pretrial conference in Courtroom 23A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 on March 19, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 1/21/2020) (kv)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Varon v. Hakmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anat Varon
Represented By: Neal Fellenbaum
Represented By: Jeffrey H. Zegen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharon Hakmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?