Pegler et al v. Television Equipment Associates, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Laura Pegler
Defendant: Television Equipment Associates, Inc., Jeffrey Norment and Richard Bradbury
Case Number: 1:2018cv04675
Filed: May 25, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: White Plains Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Kenneth M. Karas
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 123 ORDER: The Court received letters (dated October 1, 2020, and October 2, 2020) from counsel related to the Court's Order issued on September 25, 2020. Docket# 119. Because the Order relates to the parties' settlement agreement, which is confidential, the letters are to be filed under seal. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to restrict access to these letters to the parties of record and their attorneys. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause on 10/16/2020) (nb)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 122 AMENDED ORDER: For these reasons Defendant TEA is ordered to pay to Plaintiff the total amount of $6,205.84. This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court. Counsel is hereby notified that although the undersigned maintained juris diction of this matter for purposes of enforcing settlement, the upcoming retirement of the undersigned would prevent the undersigned from doing so in future. Cases assigned to the undersigned will be reassigned to a different Magistrate Judge, and counsel will be notified of that reassignment. SO ORDERED. (for LMS as to typographical correction.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison on 10/6/2020) (ks)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER: For the reasons set forth herein, the undersigned awards Plaintiff interest in the amount of $94.84 and attorneys' fees in the amount of $4,500.00. The Court's review of the claimed attorneys' fees leads to the concl usion that a substantial part of the time expended was necessary because new counsel, who had not been involved in the settlement negotiations or settlement agreement, were brought in to handle this matter at this stage. As a result, time was expende d throughout which would not have been necessaiy, at least not to that degree, if counsel at this time had also been involved in the settlement process. I therefore conclude that the claimed amount of Mr. Licare's work, at 19.4 hours, is excessi ve, and reduce the hours by 30% to 13.58 hours, for a payment due of $6,111. No information has been provided to justify the Federal Express cost, so I do not award it. Defendants have not opposed the payment of interest on the settlement a mount, and therefore the interest payment of $94.84 is ordered to be paid by Defendant TEA. For these reasons Defendant TEA is ordered to pay to Plaintiff the total amount of $6,205.84. This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court. Counsel is hereby notified that although the undersigned maintained jurisdiction of this matter for purposes of enforcing settlement, the upcoming retirement of the undersigned would prevent the undersigned from doing so in future. Cases assigned to the undersigned will be reassigned to a different Magistrate Judge, and counsel will be notified of that reassignment. (as further set forth herein). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 9/25/2020) (kv) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.
August 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER: Plaintiff's counsel is hereby directed to submit to the Court unredacted invoices for the attorney's fees claimed in its letter of August 3, 2020, for in camera review, by emailing the invoices to ChambersNYSDSmith@nysd.uscourts.gov. Counsel shall also provide an explanation, copy to Defendants' counsel, for including fees for any attorney other than Joseph Licare in the request. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 8/21/2020) (kv)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pegler et al v. Television Equipment Associates, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laura Pegler
Represented By: Sarah Ann Sulkowski
Represented By: Cassandra M. Vogel
Represented By: Russell Marc Yankwitt
Represented By: Sarah Ann Sulkowski
Represented By: Cassandra M. Vogel
Represented By: Russell Marc Yankwitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Television Equipment Associates, Inc.
Represented By: Troy David Lipp
Represented By: Andrew P. Schriever
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Norment
Represented By: Richard Francis Markert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Bradbury
Represented By: Rebecca Walker Embry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?