Keyes v. The City Of New York et al
| Mytayari Keyes |
| The City Of New York, Manuel Silva, Peter Cassidy, Michael Looney and The New York City Police Department |
| 1:2018cv04712 |
| May 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Kings |
| J. Paul Oetken |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 75 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of The City Of New York, The New York City Police Department, Manuel Silva, Michael Looney, Peter Cassidy against Mytayari Keyes. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated August 24, 2021, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 8/24/2021) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting 37 Motion to Quash. Accordingly, DANY's motion to quash is granted. The Court concludes, however, that the results of any adverse internal investigation or disciplinary proceeding involving the Defendant officers in connectio n with this incident may be subject to production in discovery. While opinion work product is broadly protected, "fact work product" encompassing factual material, including the result of a factual investigation," In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 510 F.3d 180, 183 (2d Cir. 2007) must be produced upon a showing of substantial need and the inability to obtain its equivalent from other sources. If any such investigations or proceedings involving this incident occurred and resulted i n adverse findings regarding any of the Defendant officers, the Court will entertain a motion to compel production of any pertinent documents that have not already been produced. If there was no such investigation, proceeding, or adverse finding, DANY may so state in a declaration or affidavit. SO ORDERED. (The Clerk shall close the motion at Docket No. 37.). (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 1/9/2020) (js)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
