Brightman v. 1199 SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund et al
Victoria I. Brightman |
1199 SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund and 1199 SEIU Retirement Committee |
1:2018cv04932 |
June 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Colleen McMahon |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 63 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of 1199 SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund, 1199 SEIU Retirement Committee against Victoria I. Brightman. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated March 2, 2021, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Plaintiff's counsel's request for fees is DENIED; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 3/3/2021) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km) |
Filing 63 OPINION AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Plaintiff's counsel's request for fees is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respec tfully directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. re: 53 SECOND MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Victoria I. Brightman. 55 SECOND MOTION for Summary Judgment and In Opposition to Plaintiffs Second Motion for Summary Judgment filed by 1199 SEIU Retirement Committee, 1199 SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 3/2/2021) (rjm) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. |
Filing 47 ORDER re: 46 Letter, filed by 1199 SEIU Retirement Committee, 1199 SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff may make its motion on a schedule agreed by the parties or, in the absence of such agreement, on the schedule set forth in Local Civil Rule 6.1. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 2/27/2020) (va) |
Filing 45 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall submit a joint letter to the Court updating the Court on the status of the case no later than February 24, 2020. Unless otherwise notified by the Court, all deadlines contained in any Scheduling Ord er or Case Management Plan will remain in effect notwithstanding the case's transfer. However, any previously scheduled conference is hereby ADJOURNED pending further notice from the Court. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 2/10/2020) (va) |
Filing 40 DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT denying 19 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 24 Moti on for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is denied and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part. The case is remanded to the Fund for reco nsideration in light of this opinion. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Dkt. Nos. 19 and 24. This constitutes the decision and order of the Court. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 7/10/2019) (mro) Modified on 7/10/2019 (mro). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.