Chevalier v. The City of New York et al
| Reynault Chevalier |
| The City of New York, Unknown (Officer A), Unknown (Officer B), Unknown (Officer C) and Unknown (Officer D) |
| 1:2018cv05048 |
| June 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 52 Memorandum & Opinion. in favor of The City of New York, Deanna Bunch, Jamal Williams, John Mesa, Jose Marzon against Reynault Chevalier. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in t he Court's Opinion and Order dated April 16, 2020, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 04/17/2020) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal) (dt) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
52
OPINION & ORDER re: 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The City of New York, John Mesa, Deanna Bunch, Jose Marzon, Jamal Williams. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion, (Doc. 33), and close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/16/2020) (mml) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
