Reyes v. Riverbay Corporation
Plaintiff: Damien Reyes
Defendant: Riverbay Corporation
Case Number: 1:2018cv05092
Filed: June 7, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Richard J. Sullivan
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 200 JUDGMENT: It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That after a jury trial before the Honorable Gregory H. Woods, United States District Judge, the jury having returned a verdict in favor of Defendant, the complaint is hereby dismissed. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 6/22/2021) (rro)
May 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 180 ORDER: Trial in this case is scheduled to begin on May 19, 2021. Pursuant to Rule 43(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the recovery of a witness from a serious medical condition, compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic, constitutes a compel ling circumstance and provides good cause to allow the witness (the "Remote Witness") to provide testimony remotely via videoconference. Accordingly, after due deliberation, the Court is prepared to adopt the following virtual procedures which provide appropriate safeguards in relation to the remote testimony of the witness. Any party objecting to these procedures or who wishes to suggest alternate procedures shall do so by a letter submitted on ECF no later than Thursday, May 13, 2021. The Remote Witness shall provide testimony using the WebEx platform, which has been selected by the parties. The witness shall participate in appropriate pretrial technology testing no later than May 17, 2021 and as may be required by furthe r order of the Court. The parties shall prepare two binders for the Remote Witness. The first binder ("Binder One") shall be prepared by the party offering the witness. It shall contain all exhibits that the party offering that witness i ntends for the witness to discuss at trial. The second binder ("Binder Two") shall be prepared by the party opposing the witness. Binder Two shall contain all exhibits that the opposing party intends for the witness to view during cross- examination. By no later than May 17, 2021, copies of Binder Two shall be provided to the Remote Witness as well as to opposing counsel. They shall be sealed and they shall, on the exterior of the binders, clearly instruct the witness and opposing counsel not to open the binders until directed to do so. The Remote Witness and opposing counsel shall not review Binder Two until the cross-examination begins. A hard copy and USB drive of Binder One shall be provided to the Court on May 19, 2021. A hard copy and USB drive of Binder Two shall be provided to the Court on the same date and fuurther set forth in this Order. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 5/12/2021) (rro)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 153 ORDER granting 122 Letter Motion to Seal; granting 123 Motion in Limine; denying 124 Motion in Limine; granting 128 Letter Motion for Leave to File Document. On December 4, 2020, the Court held a final pretrial conference. At the conference, the Court discussed the parties' motions in limine. Dkt. Nos. 122-1, 124. For the reasons stated on the record, Plaintiff's motions in limine are denied. Defendant's first, second, and fourth motions in limine are d enied, while Defendant's third and fifth motions in limine are granted. Defendant's sixth motion in limine is granted in part and denied in partthe determination of the amount, but not the availability, of punitive damages, will be bifurcated into a second trial phase. Defendant is directed to write the Court by December 10, 2020 regarding Defendant's proposed procedure for adjudicating the second phase. The Court also addressed the parties' motions to seal. D kt. Nos. 122, 123, 128. For the reasons stated on the record, those motions are granted. Moreover, the Court granted Defendant's application for an adjournment of the trial date, contained in Defendant's opposition to Plaintiff& #039;s application for testimony of certain witnesses to be taken by remote means. Dkt. No. 150. The Court will set a new trial date by separate order. As stated on the record, the parties are directed to submit a joint letter to the C ourt by December 15, 2020 describing their positions regarding the temporal scope of this case and, if necessary, their proposed process for litigating that issue. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at Dkt. Nos. 122, 123, 124 and 128. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 12/8/2020) (mro)
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER terminating 126 FIRST LETTER MOTION to Seal re: emailing in limine motion papers to the court. Because both redacted and unredacted versions of Plaintiff's motion in limine papers have been filed on ECF, Plaintiff should not email the motion papers to the Court. The Court expects that it will rule on the motion to seal shortly after it rules on Plaintiff's motions in limine. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 126 because it was improperly filed as a motion. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 10/23/2020) (jca)
June 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER: A jury trial in this matter will begin on Monday, January 25, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. The Court will hold a final pretrial conference in this case on Friday, December 4, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. Both the final pretrial conference and the ju ry trial will be held in Courtroom 12C of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse at 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007. The parties are directed to submit the f ollowing materials no later than October 15, 2020: (1) the joint pretrial order and other submissions permitted or required under Rule 5 of the Court's Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases, (2) a proposed brief, mutually accepta ble description of the case, to be read to the venire, and (3) a proposed brief, mutually acceptable overview of the applicable law, to be read to the jury as part of the Court's initial instructions prior to opening statements. ( Pre trial Order due by 10/15/2020., Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/4/2020 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 12C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Gregory H. Woods., Jury Trial set for 1/25/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 12C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Gregory H. Woods.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 6/18/2020) (mro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reyes v. Riverbay Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Damien Reyes
Represented By: Robert B. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Riverbay Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?