Lewis v. City Of New York , et al
Plaintiff: Lionel Lewis
Defendant: City Of New York, New York City Police Department and Police Officers John and Jane Doe # 1-10
Case Number: 1:2018cv05510
Filed: June 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 81 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 79 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of City Of New York, New York City Police Department, Police Officers John and Jane Doe # 1-10, M Raleigh against Lionel Lewis. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for th e reasons stated in the Court's Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order dated June 24, 2021, the Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed in the Order, the remaining arguments are either moot or without merit. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted and judgment is entered dismissing this case with prejudice; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 6/25/2021) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)
June 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER: The Court has filed an amended Memorandum Opinion and Order in this case to correct the date in the original Memorandum Opinion and Order, issued on May 24, 2021. No other changes have been made. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 6/24/2021) (mml)
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 75 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 68 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by M Raleigh. The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, the remaining arguments are either m oot or without merit. For the reasons explained above, the defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment dismissing this case with prejudice. The Clerk is also directed to close Docket No. 68 and to close this case. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 5/24/2021) (nb) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
February 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER: The plaintiff's response to the defendants' motion for summary judgment was due on January 29, 2021, but was not filed. The time for the plaintiff to respond is extended to February 26, 2021. The time for the defendants to reply is extended to March 12, 2021. If the plaintiff fails to submit papers in response to the motion, the motion will be decided on the papers already submitted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 2/8/2021) ( Responses due by 2/26/2021, Replies due by 3/12/2021.) (ks)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER: As discussed at the pre-motion conference held on November 30, 2020, the defendant's motion for summary judgment is due by December 30, 2020. The plaintiff's response is due by January 29, 2021, and the defendant's reply is due by February 12, 2021. (Motions due by 12/30/2020., Responses due by 1/29/2021, Replies due by 2/12/2021.) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/30/2020) (nb)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER: In light of the close of discovery on October 19, 2020, the parties are directed to contact Courtroom Deputy Rachel Slusher by email at Rachel_Slusher@nysd.uscourts.gov with three (3) mutually convenient dates, to schedule a settleme nt conference if it would be productive at this time. Due to the Court's busy calendar, settlement conferences must generally be scheduled at least six to eight weeks in advance. The Court will likely be unable to accommodate last-minute re quests for settlement conferences, and the parties should not anticipate that litigation deadlines will be adjourned in response to late requests for settlement conferences. So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 10/26/2020) (js)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER granting 58 Letter Motion for Discovery. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Warden or other official in charge of Franklin Correctional Facility, located in Malone, New York, produce inmate Lionel Lewis, NYSID No. 07882995Z, within the facili ty for the taking of his deposition by video conference on October 5, 2020, commencing at 10:00 a.m., and for so long thereafter as the deposition continues; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Lionel Lewis appear in such place as designated by the Warden of other official in charge of Franklin Correctional Facility so that his deposition may be taken; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a court reporter, designated by defendants as well as the attorneys for defendant and plaintiff, will also be present at the deposition. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the motion at ECF No. 58. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 9/15/2020) (ras)
September 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER: On September 3, 2020, the parties appeared for a telephonic discovery conference. As discussed at the conference, the following deadlines will apply in this case: By September 11, 2020, Plaintiff is ordered to correct discovery deficiencie s and to file a letter confirming that discovery has been produced. The September 11, 2020 letter shall also include dates for the depositions of Plaintiff and Officer Raleigh. The deadline to complete discovery is extended to October 19, 2020. Th e Court will not grant further extensions of this deadline. Motions for summary judgment shall be filed by November 20, 2020. Oppositions are due by December 21, 2020. Replies, if any, are due by January 11, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Discovery due by 10/19/2020, Motions due by 11/20/2020, Responses due by 12/21/2020, Replies due by 1/11/2021.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 9/3/2020) (jca)
May 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER: The parties are to follow the schedule set out in the February 20, 2020 Civil Case Management Plan. ECF No. 43. All pretrial applications, including those relating to scheduling and discovery, must comply with the Individual Practices of J udge Netburn, which are available on the Court's website https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-sarah-netburn. The parties should also review and comply with the Court's Emergency Individual Rules and Practices in Light of COVID-19, also availab le on the Courts website. A telephonic conference is scheduled for Friday, May 15, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. to discuss the discovery dispute raised in Defendant Officer Michael Raleighs May 6, 2020 letter, ECF No. 46. At that time, the parties shall cal l the Court's dedicated teleconference line at (877) 402-9757, and enter Access Code 793-8632, followed by the pound(#) key. If any party is unavailable at this time, they shall inform the Court immediately. Accordingly, the parties are encouraged to contact Courtroom Deputy Rachel Slusher at Rachel_Slusher@nysd.uscourts.gov, to schedule a settlement conference for a time when they believe it would be productive. All other provisions as set forth in this Order. So Ordered. (Telephone Conference set for 5/15/2020 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 5/11/2020) (js)
May 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER: The case is referred to Magistrate Judge Netburn for general pretrial matters. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 5/7/2020) (jca)
January 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER: The parties should report to the Court within seven days regarding the results of the mediation and to schedule any further proceedings before the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 1/30/2020) (va)
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: 14 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint. filed by New York City Police Department, City Of New York, 27 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply in further suppo rt of defendants' motion to dismiss addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Kevin J. Kelly dated April 18, 2019. filed by New York City Police Department, M Raleigh, City Of New York. The Court has considered all of the arguments rai sed by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the reasons explained above, the defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. The plaintiff may file an amended complaint within twenty-one days after the date of this Opinion. The Clerk of Court is directed to close all pending motions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 7/1/2019) (ks)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lewis v. City Of New York , et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lionel Lewis
Represented By: Howard David Simmons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City Of New York
Represented By: Kevin James Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Police Department
Represented By: Kevin James Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Police Officers John and Jane Doe # 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?