Vuppala v. 998LQ Sushi, Inc. et al
| Kiran Vuppala |
| Yen, Shin Yi, Yu-Chen Lin 2011 Irrevocable Trust, 998LQ Sushi, Inc., Yen, Tze Hao, Chin-Min Yen and 998LQ Sushi, Inc. a New York corporation doing business as Okinii |
| 1:2018cv05716 |
| June 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| J Paul Oetken |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER: Plaintiff's letter does not establish "good cause" for his failure to serve Defendants within the 90-day period established by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 11/14/2018) (ama)
|
| Filing 17 STATUS REPORT. re Order DE 12 Document filed by Kiran Vuppala.(Weitz, Ben-Zion) |
| Filing 16 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. 998LQ Sushi, Inc. served on 10/31/2018, answer due 11/21/2018. Service was accepted by Amy Lesch, as Authorized Agent of the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York. Document filed by Kiran Vuppala. (Weitz, Ben-Zion) |
| Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Chin-Min Yen served on 11/2/2018, answer due 11/23/2018. Service was accepted by Sue Fing. Document filed by Kiran Vuppala. (Weitz, Ben-Zion) |
| Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Yu-Chen Lin 2011 Irrevocable Trust served on 11/2/2018, answer due 11/23/2018. Service was accepted by Sue Fing. Document filed by Kiran Vuppala. (Weitz, Ben-Zion) |
| Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Yen, Shin Yi served on 11/2/2018, answer due 11/23/2018. Service was accepted by Sue Fing. Document filed by Kiran Vuppala. (Weitz, Ben-Zion) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to advise the Court in writing why he has failed to serve the summonses and complaint on Defendants within the 90-day period, or, if Defendants have been served, when and in what manner such service was made. If no written communication is received by November 12, 2018, showing good cause why such service was not made within 90 days, the Court will dismiss the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 10/25/2018) (ama)
|
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Yu-Chen Lin 2011 Irrevocable Trust. (pne) |
| Filing 10 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to YU-CHEN LIN 2011 IRREVOCABLE TRUST, C/O CHIN-MIN YEN, as TRUSTEE, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kiran Vuppala. (Weitz, Ben-Zion) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Yen, Shin Yi. (vf) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Yen, Tze Hao. (vf) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to 998LQ Sushi, Inc. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Ben-Zion Bradley Weitz to RE-FILE Document No. #4 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Docket entry error, enter all the name(s) of party(ies) the summons is to be issued for when prompted. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (vf) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to SHIN YI YEN, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kiran Vuppala. (Weitz, Ben-Zion) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to TZE HAO YEN, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kiran Vuppala. (Weitz, Ben-Zion) |
| Filing 4 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT SUMMONS REQUESTED - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to YU-CHEN LIN 2011 IRREVOCABLE TRUST, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kiran Vuppala. (Weitz, Ben-Zion) Modified on 10/1/2018 (vf). |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to 998LQ SUSHI, INC., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Kiran Vuppala. (Weitz, Ben-Zion) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pne) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pne) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pne) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Ben-Zion Bradley Weitz. The party information for the following parties has been modified: Kiran Vuppala, Yen, Shin Yi. The information for the parties has been modified for the following reasons: party role was entered incorrectly; party text was omitted. (pne) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Weitz, Ben-Zion) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 998LQ Sushi, Inc., Chin-Min Yen, Trustee, Yen, Shin Yi, Yen, Tze Hao, Yu-Chen Lin 2011 Irrevocable Trust. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 0208-15240451)Document filed by Kiran Vuppala.(Weitz, Ben-Zion) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
