Rodriguez v. City of New York et al
| Ramon Rodriguez |
| New York City Department of Corrections, City of New York, State of New York, Supreme Court of the State of New York, Legal Aid Society and District Attorney Manhattan County |
| 1:2018cv05810 |
| June 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Unassigned |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed a copy of #4 Order Granting IFP Application to Ramon Rodriguez 349-17-07368 Rikers Island- A.M.K.C. 18-18 Hazen Street East Elmhurst, NY 11370. (aea) |
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 8/16/2018) (sac) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #4 Order Granting IFP Application, to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (sac) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER AUTHORIZATION. Document filed by Ramon Rodriguez.(rdz) |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Document filed by Ramon Rodriguez.(rdz) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Ramon Rodriguez.(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
