Chen v. Edo Sushi & Grill, Inc. et al
| Fensong Chen and Fen Song Chen |
| Jane Doe, Edo Sushi&Grill, INC, John Doe, Danny Tam, Choe Lin, Ying Liu, Kai Liu, Penny Chen, Del Belfessa and Edo Sushi & Grill, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv06081 |
| July 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Kings |
| Ronnie Abrams |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 216 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Yong, John) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Del Belfessa, Penny Chen, Jane Doe, John Doe, Edo Sushi& Grill, INC, Choe Lin, Kai Liu, Ying Liu, Danny Tam. Document filed by Fen Song Chen.(Yong, John) |
| Filing 2 FILING ERROR -PDF ERROR- WRONG PDF FILE ASSOCIATED WITH DOCKET ENTRY - COMPLAINT against Fensong Chen. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 0208-15286958)Document filed by Fensong Chen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 summons, #4 summons, #5 summons, #6 summons, #7 summons, #8 summons, #9 summons)(Yong, John) Modified on 7/6/2018 (vf). |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR -PDF ERROR- WRONG PDF FILE ASSOCIATED WITH DOCKET ENTRY - COMPLAINT against Fensong Chen. Document filed by Fensong Chen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 summons, #4 summons, #5 summons, #6 summons, #7 summons, #8 summons, #9 summons)(Yong, John) Modified on 7/6/2018 (vf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
