Cohen v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
| Sherri Cohen |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Transunion LLC |
| 1:2018cv06210 |
| July 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Jed S Rakoff |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent TransUnion, Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for Transunion LLC. Document filed by Transunion LLC.(Nicodemus, Camille) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Camille Renee Nicodemus on behalf of Transunion LLC. (Nicodemus, Camille) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Nicodemus, Camille) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 154952/2018. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 0208-15299512).Document filed by Transunion LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Letter From State Of New York - Department Of State, Division OF Corporation, Serving Trans Union, LLC, #2 Exhibit B-Notice Of Electronic Filing, #3 Exhibit C-Summons To Trans Union, LLC, #4 Exhibit D-Complaint To Trans Union, LLC)(Nicodemus, Camille) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
