Mahon v. Annucci et al
Plaintiff: Kalonji Mahon
Defendant: Dep'ty Superint D. Maume and Anthony Annucci
Case Number: 1:2018cv06508
Filed: July 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Oneida
Presiding Judge: Colleen McMahon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2018 Filing 5 DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF IN RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; re: #4 Order 30 Days Other (case opening). Document filed by Kalonji Mahon. (sc)
August 2, 2018 Mailed a copy of #4 Order 30 Days Other (case opening), to Kalonji Mahon 12-A-5136 Mid-State Correctional Facility P.O. Box 2500 Marcy, NY 13403. (vba)
August 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915(g): The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this case to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. The Court directs Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not deny his IFP application under the PLRA's three strikes provision, 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Plaintiff must file a declaration within thirty days explaining any reason why he should not be barred under the PLRA. A declaration form is attached to this order for Plaintiff's convenience. If Plaintiff does not show cause, or if he fails to respond to this order, the Court will deny Plaintiff's IFP application, dismiss this action without prejudice, and bar Plaintiff under 1915(g) from filing future actions IFP while he is a prisoner. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 8/1/2018) (mro)
August 1, 2018 Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #4 Order 30 Days Other (case opening), to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (mro)
August 1, 2018 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (mro)
July 18, 2018 Filing 3 PRISONER AUTHORIZATION. Document filed by Kalonji Mahon.(rdz)
July 18, 2018 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Anthony Annucci, D. Maume. Document filed by Kalonji Mahon.(rdz)
July 18, 2018 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Kalonji Mahon.(rdz)
July 18, 2018 Case Designated ECF. (rdz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mahon v. Annucci et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dep'ty Superint D. Maume
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony Annucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kalonji Mahon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?