Wallace v. Esper
Plaintiff: Susan V. Wallace
Defendant: Dr. Mark T. Esper
Case Number: 1:2018cv06525
Filed: July 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Ronnie Abrams
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e-2ag Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing. On August 9, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for permission for electronic case filing using ECF. That request is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. 5 and to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 8/14/2018) (rj)
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #8 Order on Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing, to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (rj)
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Mailed a copy of #8 Order on Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing, to Susan V. Wallace 8201 4th Avenue, Apt. 3J Brooklyn, NY 11209. (vba)
August 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Mark T. Esper served on 8/3/2018, answer due 8/24/2018. Service was accepted by Hao Jin Li, Legal Clerk, U.S. Attorney's Office, 86 Chambers Street, New York, N.Y. 10007. Service was also made by Mail to Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, D.C. Document filed by Susan V. Wallace. (sc)
August 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 DECLARATION of Susan V. Wallace IN SUPPORT OF FORM MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING PRIVILEGES; re: #5 MOTION for Permission for Susan V. Wallace to participate in electronic case filing in this case. Document filed by Susan V. Wallace. (sc)
August 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION FOR PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC CASE FILING; re: for Permission for Susan V. Wallace to participate in electronic case filing in this case. Document filed by Susan V. Wallace.(sc)
July 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Susan V. Wallace consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Susan V. Wallace.(sc)
July 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (pc) (pc).
July 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark T. Esper. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 465401214199)Document filed by Susan V. Wallace.(pc)
July 19, 2018 Opinion or Order SUMMONS ISSUED as to Mark T. Esper. (pc)
July 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (pc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wallace v. Esper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan V. Wallace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Mark T. Esper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?