Ozuzu v. Function(x), Inc.
Plaintiff: Chioma Ozuzu
Defendant: Function(x), Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv06799
Filed: July 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Edgardo Ramos
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2018 Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Function(x), Inc. served on 8/13/2018, answer due 9/4/2018. Service was accepted by Legal Representative as Agent for Service -Corporation Service Company on behalf of Function(x). Inc.. Document filed by Chioma Ozuzu. (Dunne, Joseph)
August 31, 2018 Filing 7 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 508, the Register of Copyrights is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following copyright(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Form e-mailed to Register of Copyrights. (pc)
August 24, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Richard Liebowitz on behalf of Chioma Ozuzu. (Liebowitz, Richard)
July 30, 2018 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Function(x), Inc.. (pc)
July 30, 2018 Case Designated ECF. (pc)
July 30, 2018 Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pc)
July 30, 2018 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (pc)
July 27, 2018 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Dunne, Joseph)
July 27, 2018 Filing 3 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 121 Form Copyright for case opening submitted to court for review.(Dunne, Joseph)
July 27, 2018 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Function(x), Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Chioma Ozuzu. (Dunne, Joseph)
July 27, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Function(x), Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 0208-15379929)Document filed by Chioma Ozuzu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Dunne, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ozuzu v. Function(x), Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Function(x), Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chioma Ozuzu
Represented By: Joseph Anthony Dunne
Represented By: Richard Liebowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?